(Police encounter) The High Court held that no policeman was injured in the police encounter and no police vehicle was hit by bullets, which casts doubt on the reality of the encounter and the recovery of the weapon was suspicious, raising questions on the integrity of the chain of custody. Accused acquitted. 2024 Y L R 905

-


(Police encounter)
The High Court held that no policeman was injured in the police encounter and no police vehicle was hit by bullets, which casts doubt on the reality of the encounter and the recovery of the weapon was suspicious, raising questions on the integrity of the chain of custody. Accused acquitted.

2024 Y L R 905



1. پولیس مقابلہ: ملزمان نے پولیس پارٹی پر فائرنگ کی تھی، لیکن کوئی پولیس اہلکار زخمی نہ ہوا اور نہ ہی پولیس کی گاڑی کو کوئی گولی لگی، جو مقابلے کی حقیقت پر سوال اٹھاتا ہے۔


2. اسلحہ کی برآمدگی: ملزمان سے اسلحہ برآمد کیا گیا، لیکن کیس پراپرٹی کو فورینسک سائنس لیبارٹری بھیجنے میں پولیس کے عمل میں سقم پایا گیا، جس سے شواہد کی سالمیت پر سوال اٹھا۔


3. چین آف کسٹڈی: کیس پراپرٹی کو فورینسک لیبارٹری تک پہنچانے میں کوئی پولیس اہلکار گواہ نہ تھا، جس سے چین آف کسٹڈی کے بارے میں خدشات پیدا ہوئے۔


4. عدالت کا فیصلہ: ان سقموں کی بنیاد پر ہائی کورٹ نے ٹرائل کورٹ کی سزا کو کالعدم قرار دیتے ہوئے ملزمان کو بری کر دیا۔

2024 Y L R 905

[Sindh]

Before Zafar Ahmed Rajput and Amjad Ali Bohio, JJ

FAIYAZ KHAN and another---Appellants

Versus

The STATE---Respondent

Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Jail Appeal No. 81 of 2023, decided on 24th November, 2023.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---

----Ss. 324 & 353---Sindh Arms Act (V of 2013), S. 23(1)(a)---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S.7 (h)---Attempt to Qatl-i-amd, police encounter, act of terrorism---Appreciation of evidence---Recovery of weapons---Chain of custody---Proof---Accused persons were convicted for commission of attempt to Qatl-i-amd, police encounter, recovery of firearms and act of terrorism and were variously sentenced with maximum imprisonment for ten years--- Validity--- Alleged encounter lasted for few minutes but no one from police party received any injury to his body---Even no bullet hit official vehicle of police, at the hands of accused persons who had pistols and had dared to open straight fire on police party and suddenly they stopped firing after two shots each, though they had more live bullets in their alleged recovered pistols---No blood marks were found at the occurrence, which fact alone cast doubt on the authenticity of alleged encounter---No police official was listed among prosecution witnesses who took the case property to Forensic Science Laboratory---Such discrepancy raised significant concerns in delivery of parcels intact to Forensic Science Laboratory---No prosecution witness disclosed name of the police official through whom case property was sent to Forensic Science Laboratory---Prosecution failed to establish safe departure and delivery of parcels to Forensic Expert, in circumstances---Such omission had raised doubts about integrity of chain of custody---High Court set aside conviction and sentence awarded by Trial Court and accused was acquitted of the charge---Appeal was allowed, in circumstances.

       Kamal Din alias Kamala v. The State 2018 SCMR 577 and Shamoon alias Shamma v. The State 1995 SCMR 1377 rel.

       Abdul Nabi and Iftikhar Ahmed Shah for Appellants.

       Saleem Akhter Buriro, Addl. Prosecutor General, Sindh for Respondent.

 


For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.




  













 



 







































 





































and

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Property ki taqseem ,Warasat main warson ka hisa

-
Image
Inheritance properties distribution  What is the new law of inheritance in Pakistan? As o. Here are some key points regarding inheritance in Pakistan: 1. **Islamic Inheritance Laws:**    - Pakistan follows the principles of Islamic inheritance, as outlined in the Quran. These laws dictate the distribution of an individual's assets among heirs. 2. **Intestate Succession:**    - If a person dies without a will (intestate), the distribution of the estate is guided by Islamic inheritance laws. 3. **Heirs:**    - Common heirs include spouses, children, parents, and other close relatives. The specific shares of each heir are determined by Islamic rules. 4. **Wills:**    - While Islamic inheritance principles are followed in the absence of a will, individuals have the option to draft a will to specify how they want their assets distributed. However, the will must not contradict Islamic inheritance laws. 5. **Legal Assistance:**    - It's...
Read more

Punishment for violation of section 144 crpc | dafa 144 in Pakistan means,kia hai , khalaf warzi per kitni punishment hu gi،kab or kese lagai ja ja sakti hai.

-
Image
How to enforce  section 144 "Dafa 144" is a term used in Pakistan to refer to Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code. When authorities impose Dafa 144, it means that they are prohibiting the assembly of a certain number of people in a specific area to maintain public order and prevent disturbances. Dafa 144 meaning in Urdu "Dafa 144" ایک اصطلاح ہے جو پاکستان میں ضابطہ فوجداری کی دفعہ 144 کے لیے استعمال ہوتی ہے۔ جب حکام دفا 144 نافذ کرتے ہیں، تو اس کا مطلب یہ ہوتا ہے کہ وہ امن عامہ کو برقرار رکھنے اور خلل کو روکنے کے لیے مخصوص علاقے میں لوگوں کی ایک خاص تعداد کے جمع ہونے پر پابندی لگا رہے ہیں۔  144 or section 144 Aksar dekha gia hai ke dafa. 144 ka nafaz kia jata hai magar humare logo ke zahan ma swalat uthte hain ke ye section kia hai , kab or kio lagai jati hai. Saza kia hu gi .agar koi banda section 144 ki khalaf warzi karta hai. Section 144 ki khalaf warzi per 6 month qaid or jurmana ki saza hu sakti ha. Under section 188 ppc 144 section or 188 section parhai...
Read more

Bachon ki custody of minors after divorce or separation

-
Image
Custody procedure of kids through court  PLD 2023 Lahore 433 Constitutional petition against an order passed under S. 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act , 1890 , for the grant of interim custody is maintainable because the remedy of appeal against such an order is not available , as per S. 14 ( 3 ) of the Family Courts Act. Interim custody of minor --- Scope --- Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act , 1890 , enacts the power to make interlocutory order for production of minor and interim protection of person and property .  Childern Custody after divorce or separation through Guardian court                                     videos main detail batai gai hai . Aisa iqrarnama jiss main walda apne khazanat ke haq main dastbardari show kar rahi hu bilkul ghair qanooni hai.(PLD 2024 supreme Court 291) Ajj hum Baat karain ge bachon ki custody ko le ke jo ke aik buhat nazak mas...
Read more