Qanuni Amdad urdu

Title: Clarifying the Scope of Co-Owner Rights: Analysis of the Judgment in 2024 CLC 699 In a recent judgment, the issue of whether a co-sharer or co-owner can file a suit for injunction to protect their rights without seeking partition has been brought to light. The case, indexed as 2024 CLC 699, raises significant questions regarding property rights and legal remedies available to co-owners. The matter under consideration finds its roots in the landmark case of ALI GOHAR KHAN v. SHER AYAZ and others (1989 SCMR 130), where the Supreme Court of Pakistan deliberated on a similar issue for the first time. Subsequently, in FAZAL and others v. GHULAM MUHAMMAD and others (2003 SCMR 999), a bench comprising three Honorable Judges of the Supreme Court established that a suit for permanent injunction is maintainable on behalf of a co-sharer or co-owner. The fundamental principle elucidated through these legal precedents is that every co-sharer or co-owner retains ownership rights over each and

The main point discussed by the Supreme Court in Criminal Petition No.99-K/2018 revolves around the limited role of the Justice of Peace in scrutinizing cases under Section 22-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court emphasized that the Justice of Peace's duty is primarily to ascertain whether a cognizable case is made out, rather than delving into the merits of the case or assuming roles beyond the prescribed jurisdiction. This underscores the importance of adhering to procedural law and avoiding undue interference in the investigative process. فوجداری پٹیشن نمبر 99-K/2018 میں سپریم کورٹ کی طرف سے زیر بحث اہم نکتہ ضابطہ فوجداری کے سیکشن 22-A کے تحت مقدمات کی جانچ پڑتال میں جسٹس آف پیس کے محدود کردار کے گرد گھومتا ہے۔ عدالت نے اس بات پر زور دیا کہ جسٹس آف پیس کا فرض بنیادی طور پر اس بات کا پتہ لگانا ہے کہ آیا کوئی قابل سماعت کیس بنایا گیا ہے، بجائے اس کے کہ کیس کی خوبیوں کا جائزہ لیا جائے یا مقررہ دائرہ اختیار سے باہر کردار ادا کیا جائے۔ یہ طریقہ کار کے قانون پر عمل کرنے اور

دعوئ استقرار حق میں انتقال وغیرہ کو چیلنج کیا جاتا وہاں اس دن کے رپٹ روزنامچہ کو بھی چیلنج کرنا ضروری ہے۔ Law deal to Roznamcha waqiati   **Understanding Section 42 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967** Section 42 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967, plays a pivotal role in regulating land transactions and maintaining accurate land records in the province. This section outlines the procedure for reporting and recording acquisitions of land rights, ensuring transparency and legal compliance in property dealings. **Reporting Requirements** One of the key provisions of Section 42 is the obligation placed on individuals acquiring land rights, whether through inheritance, purchase, mortgage, gift, or any other means, to report such acquisitions to the designated Patwari within three months from the date of acquisition. This reporting requirement applies to both landowners and tenants with fixed-term leases exceeding one year. **Recording in Roznamcha Waqiati** Upon receiving the report, t

Discount in punishment   the Probation and Parole Act of 2019 in Pakistan Introduction: In 2019, Pakistan took a significant step forward in its criminal justice system with the enactment of the Probation and Parole Act. This legislation aimed to reform and modernize the approach towards rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders into society. Understanding the key provisions and implications of this act is crucial in comprehending the evolving landscape of criminal justice in Pakistan. Key Provisions: 1. **Probation**: The act introduces the concept of probation, allowing certain offenders to serve their sentences under supervision in the community rather than in prison. This provision aims to promote rehabilitation and reduce overcrowding in prisons. 2. **Parole**: Similarly, the act establishes a framework for the granting of parole, enabling eligible prisoners to be released early from their sentences under specific conditions. Parole serves as a means of gradually transitioning