Qanuni Amdad urdu

Amendment 2022 in section 9A cnsa not effect on the convicted person who are convicted before 2022. Form No:HCJD/C-121 ORDER SHEET LAHORE HIGH COURT, MULTAN BENCH, MULTAN JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Case No. Writ Petition No.16629 of 2023 Imran Mustafa Versus Government of Punjab, etc S.No. of order/ Proceeding Date of order/ Proceeding Order with signature of Judge, and that of Parties of counsel, where necessary. 21.11.2023 Mr. Muhammad Usman Sharif Khosa, Advocate  for the petitioner/convict. Miss Samina Mahmood Rana, Assistant  Advocate General with Dr. Qadeer Alam, AIG  (Prison), Punjab. Mr. Muhammad Ali Shahab, Deputy Prosecutor  General. Kizar Abbas, SO (Legal), Home Department,  South Punjab. Instant is a petition that has been filed by  Imran Mustafa (convict herein) under Article  199(1)(ii) of the Constitution of Islam Republic of  Pakistan 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the  “Constitution”) with the supplication that reads: “…awfully implored that instant  solicitation be appr

High court set aside exparte decree just because the decree was not sent to defendant as required by family court act section 9 (7).  CJDA 38. JUDGMENT SHEET. LAHORE HIGH COURT  RAWALPINDI BENCH RAWALPINDI. JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT W.P.No.2998 of 2018 FAZAL HUSSAIN Versus. RAZIA BEGUM, ETC. JUDGMENT. Mirza Viqas Rauf, J. This constitutional petition emanates  from a suit for recovery of maintenance instituted by respondent No.1  (hereinafter referred to as “respondent”). Suit was decreed ex-parte vide  judgment dated 17th March, 2016. The petitioner moved an application for  setting aside ex-parte decree but it was dismissed vide order dated 3rd February, 2018, being barred by time. Feeling dissatisfied, the petitioner  though filed an appeal before the learned Additional District Judge,  Chakwal but remained unsuccessful as the appeal was dismissed through  judgment dated 30th July, 2018. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner  was never served with the pro