Posts

Showing posts from October 21, 2024

Medical admission | In a writ petition, the Sindh High Court challenged the criteria of preference given to those who have completed two years of education from abroad over those who have studied in Pakistan for admission to medical colleges, which the court termed as unreasonable and denied Pakistani nationals. Eligible to apply for general merit seats. 2024 M L D 225

Image
In a writ petition, the Sindh High Court challenged the criteria of preference given to those who have completed two years of education from abroad over those who have studied in Pakistan for admission to medical colleges, which the court termed as unreasonable and denied Pakistani nationals. Eligible to apply for general merit seats. 2024 M L D 225 اس کیس (Nawal اور دیگر بمقابلہ فیڈریشن آف پاکستان اور دیگر، 2024 MLD 225)** کا** مرکزی نکتہ میڈیکل کالجز میں بیرون ملک پاکستانیوں کے لیے داخلے کے معیار پر آئینی اعتراض تھا۔ درخواست گزاروں نے اس بات پر اعتراض کیا کہ ایسے امیدوار جو کم از کم دو سال بیرون ملک تعلیم حاصل کر چکے تھے، انہیں مقامی پاکستانی امیدواروں کے مقابلے میں فوقیت دی جا رہی تھی، جسے انہوں نے امتیازی سلوک قرار دیا۔ اہم نکات: درجہ بندی کا مسئلہ: عدالت نے یہ مؤقف اپنایا کہ صرف دو سال بیرون ملک تعلیم حاصل کرنے والے امیدواروں کو مقامی تعلیم یافتہ افراد سے بہتر سمجھنا غیر منصفانہ ہے۔ یہ درجہ بندی پاکستان میں تعلیم کی حالت کے بارے میں ایک منفی رائے ظاہر کرتی ہے جو غیر مناسب ہے۔ میرٹ...

302 convicted | Reasons for conviction in murder and robbery cases 1. Testimony of eyewitnesses which included the details of the incident and the identity of the accused were found to be credible. 2. The delay in filing the FIR was explained due to the return of the victim's parents and the burial. 3. The evidence proved to be strong and reliable such as the recovery of the pistol and the empty shell. 4. The identification of the accused was carried out at night by the light of bulb, on which there was no contradiction. 5. The testimony was found to be consistent with the medical evidence which corroborated the statement of the witnesses. 6. Minor discrepancies did not affect the trial and were ignored. 7. The testimony of the relative witnesses was considered credible because they gave the correct description of the incident. 8. On conviction of criminal liability appeal dismissed and conviction upheld. 2024 M L D 246

Image
Reasons for conviction in murder and robbery cases 1. Testimony of eyewitnesses which included the details of the incident and the identity of the accused were found to be credible. 2. The delay in filing the FIR was explained due to the return of the victim's parents and the burial. 3. The evidence proved to be strong and reliable such as the recovery of the pistol and the empty shell. 4. The identification of the accused was carried out at night by the light of bulb, on which there was no contradiction. 5. The testimony was found to be consistent with the medical evidence which corroborated the statement of the witnesses. 6. Minor discrepancies did not affect the trial and were ignored. 7. The testimony of the relative witnesses was considered credible because they gave the correct description of the incident. 8. On conviction of criminal liability appeal dismissed and conviction upheld. 2024 M L D 246 مقدمے میں عدالت نے عینی شاہدین کی معتبر گواہی، ایف آئی آر میں تاخیر کی مناسب و...