Qanuni Amdad urdu

Certainly! Here's a summary of the main story of the case law and the key points discussed by the Lahore High Court: **Main Story of the Case Law:** - The case revolves around a dispute regarding a land possession decree dating back to 1956. - The original decree was amended in 1991, and subsequent execution petitions were filed by the decree holders to enforce the judgment. - The petitioner, Sabir Ali, raised objections to the execution petitions, arguing that they were time-barred as they were filed more than 20 years after the decree. **Key Points Discussed by the Lahore High Court:** 1. **Timeliness of Execution Petitions:** The court examined whether the execution petitions were filed within the statutory time limits prescribed by law. 2. **Nature of Orders by the Executing Court:** The court analyzed the orders passed by the executing court, particularly whether they constituted final orders or merely suspended the execution proceedings. 3. **Revival vs. Fresh Application:**

Specific performance  Certainly! Here's the story of the case: The case revolves around a dispute over the sale of a property located in Gulberg-III, Lahore. The respondent, who wanted to purchase the property, entered into an agreement with the petitioner, the seller. According to the agreement, the respondent paid earnest money of Rs. 5 million and was supposed to pay the remaining Rs. 7 million upon the execution of the sale deed by a specified target date of 05.05.2014. However, despite the earnest money being paid, the petitioner failed to fulfill their obligations under the agreement. They did not initiate the process of transferring the property or clear any encumbrances on it by the target date. Additionally, the petitioner claimed to have purchased another property from someone else due to the respondent's alleged failure to pay the balance sale consideration on time. In response, the respondent argued that they were ready and willing to perform their part of the agree