Qanuni Amdad urdu

Stereo. H C J D A-38. JUDGMENT SHEET IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT RFA No.20881 of 2023 National Highway Authority, Islamabad through its  Project Director Zafar Mehmood  Versus Muhammad Afzal Bhatti & another J U D G M E N T Date of hearing: 03.06.2024. Appellant by: M/s Muhammad Saim Chaudhary, Dewan  Zakir Hussain and Saima Safdar  Chaudhry, Advocates. Mr. Muhammad Zain Qazi, Assistant  Attorney General on Court’s call. Respondents  Mr. Najaf Muzammal Khan, Advocate. Mr. Muhammad Saad Bin Ghazi, Assistant  Advocate General on Court’s call. MUHAMMAD SAJID MEHMOOD SETHI, J.- Through instant appeal, appellant has challenged judgment  dated 07.01.2023, passed by learned Senior Civil Judge (Civil  Division), Gujranwala, whereby Reference Application under  Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (“the Act of  1894”), filed by respondent No.1, was accepted and he was  held entitled to get compensation of acquired land @  Rs.20,00,000/- per Acre along with 1

10 years rent agreement . eviction petition dismissed . JUDGMENT SHEET LAHORE HIGH COURT LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Writ Petition No.38539 of 2023  Maqsood Ahmad Vs. Additional District Judge, etc. J U D G M E N T Date of Hearing: 14.05.2024 Petitioner by: Hafiz Rehman Aziz, Advocate. Respondent No.3 by: Mr. Salah-ud-Din Siddiqui, Advocate.   Anwaar Hussain, J. Through this single judgment, present as  well as connected constitutional petition bearing W.P. No.69876/2023  are being simultaneously decided, as common question of law and facts  are involved, and both the petitions have laid challenge to the findings  of the Courts below, emanating from the eviction proceedings initiated  by respondent No.3, namely, Riasat Ali, (“respondent”), who is the  petitioner in connected petition.  2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tenancy  between the petitioner and the respondent was valid for a period of 10- years and the eviction was sought on the ground of default and perso

 Stereo. H C J D A 38 Judgment Sheet IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE (JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT) Criminal Appeal No.24464-J of 2021 Muhammad Arshad & others Versus The State Date of Hearing  06.06.2024 Appellant Muhammad Arshad  by: M/s Rashid Javed Lodhi, Ali Hussain,  Muhammad Adnan Malik and Hafiz  Sami-ur-Rehman, Advocates. Appellants Maqsood Ahmad and  Mudassar in person and by Mr. Khurshid Anwar Bhindar,  Advocate.  Complainant by: Nemo. State by: Ms. Samra Irshad, Assistant District  Public Prosecutor. ======= Shakil Ahmad, J. Muhammad Arshad, Mudassar and  Maqsood Ahmad appellants have preferred the instant Criminal Appeal  through jail authorities, to challenge their conviction and sentences. They  were indicted and tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Depalpur  along with co-accused Muhammad Din, Akram and Haq Nawaz on the  charge under sections 302, 364, 109, 148, 149 PPC in private complaint  titled Muhammad Hussain vs. Muhammad Arshad and 05-others relating to  c