Qanuni Amdad urdu

Section 561 crpc  Title: Understanding Section 561A of the Criminal Procedure Code in Pakistan Section 561A of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) in Pakistan holds significant importance in the legal landscape of the country. This provision empowers the High Court to exercise its inherent jurisdiction to make any order necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Let's delve deeper into the nuances and implications of this section. ### Background: Enacted to uphold the principles of justice and prevent the misuse of legal procedures, Section 561A is a pivotal aspect of the CrPC in Pakistan. It grants the High Court wide discretionary powers to intervene in legal proceedings, ensuring fairness and equity. ### Scope and Application: 1. **Ends of Justice:**    The section enables the High Court to issue orders to serve the ends of justice. This includes rectifying errors, ensuring fair trials, and preventing injustice in any stage of leg...

Here are a few notable case laws related to visitation rights and the welfare of children: 1. **Mst. Madiha Younus Vs. Imran Ahmed (2018 SCMR 1991)**:    - This case emphasizes the importance of maintaining a relationship between a minor child and a non-custodial parent. It highlights that denying visitation rights can lead to emotional deprivation for the child and underscores the need for a properly chalked visitation schedule. 2. **Mst. Amina Bibi vs. Muhammad Bilal (2015 YLR 2482)**:    - In this case, the court emphasized the welfare principle while deciding visitation rights. It stressed that the welfare of the child is of paramount importance and should be considered above the interests of the parents. 3. **Muhammad Aslam vs. Muhammad Afzal (2013 CLC 1108)**:    - This case underscores the rights of non-custodial parents to visit their children. It highlights that visitation rights should be granted unless there are compelling reasons to deny them, k...

Apologies for the oversight. Here are some case laws from Pakistan related to contractual disputes and arbitration: 1. **Punjab Small Industries Corporation v. M/s Fair Traders (2009 CLC 1617)**:    - In this case, the Lahore High Court held that if a contract contains a provision for the payment of interest on delayed payments, then the party entitled to receive the payment can claim interest as part of damages for the delay. 2. **Nasir & Co. v. Chief Executive, Cantonment Board (2004 CLC 925)**:    - The Lahore High Court in this case emphasized that if a contract is silent on the issue of interest on delayed payments, then interest cannot be awarded as part of damages unless there is a statutory provision allowing for the same. 3. **Crescent Board Mills Ltd. v. Mohammad Hanif (2009 CLC 1325)**:    - In this case, the Lahore High Court held that if there is an express or implied promise in the contract for payment of interest in case of delayed paymen...

The case involves a challenge to Regulation 4(7)(b) of the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) Regulation 2023, regarding admission quotas for overseas Pakistani students.The case involves a challenge to Regulation 4(7)(b) of the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) Regulation 2023, regarding admission quotas for overseas Pakistani students  The petitioner sought to strike down the regulation, alleging it discriminated against Pakistani citizens residing in certain countries. However, the court found that the regulation did not discriminate and upheld its legality. The petitioner failed to demonstrate foreign residency at the time of application, a prerequisite for admission under the foreign quota. The court emphasized that the regulation was not discriminatory and dismissed the petition. اس کیس میں پاکستان میڈیکل اینڈ ڈینٹل کونسل (PMDC) ریگولیشن 2023 کے ریگولیشن 4(7)(b) کو چیلنج کیا گیا ہے، جو بیرون ملک مقیم پاکستانی طلباء کے داخلے کے کوٹے سے متعلق ہے۔ درخواست گزار ن...

Banking court blocked id card open by high court. In this case, M/s Al-Harmain & Co. contested a suit filed by MCB Bank Limited for the recovery of funds. The Banking Court issued non-bailable arrest warrants and blocked CNICs of the appellants without proper inquiry. The appellants argued that this violated due process, citing relevant case law. The court agreed, emphasizing the importance of CNICs in daily life and fundamental rights. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, permitting a fresh process to be initiated lawfully. ینک  کی طرف سے دائر کردہ مقدمہ ۔ بینکنگ کورٹ نے ناقابل ضمانت وارنٹ گرفتاری جاری کیے اور مناسب انکوائری کیے بغیر اپیل کنندگان کے شناختی کارڈ بلاک کر دیے۔ اپیل کنندگان نے استدلال کیا کہ اس سے متعلقہ کیس قانون کا حوالہ دیتے ہوئے مناسب عمل کی خلاف ورزی ہوئی ہے۔ عدالت نے روزمرہ کی زندگی میں CNICs کی اہمیت اور بنیادی حقوق پر زور دیتے ہوئے اتفاق کیا۔ اور اپیل منظور آرڈر بینکنگ کورٹ set a side کر دیے۔ Stereo. H C J D A-38. JUDGMENT SHEET IN...