Posts

Featured Post

Court marriage karne ka tareeka | court marriage process in Pakistan.

-
Image
  What is the Court marriage meaning Court marriage typically refers to a legal union between two individuals that takes place in a court of law, as opposed to a religious ceremony or a traditional cultural celebration. In Pakistan, court marriages are a straightforward and secular way for couples to formalize their marital status. The ceremony is conducted by a legal authority, often a judge or a magistrate, and it involves the couple signing the marriage documents in the presence of witnesses. This type of marriage is recognized by the state and carries legal validity.              Court marriage procedure  In Pakistan in Urdu . Dosto humare logon main buhat se log court marriage ke bare main na jante hoe buhat si mushkalat ka shikar ho jatain  hain . main ne aise buht se cases handle kiye hain jin main larki ki razamandi ke sath couple ghar se bhagtey hain . magar qanoon se nawaqfiat hone ki wajah se  wo court marriage nahin kr patey jiss ka nateeja yeh niklta hai keh larki
43 comments
Read more

32 lakh cheque Bail accepted 489F

-
Image
Bail accepted 489F عنوان: لاہور ہائی کورٹ نے چیک ڈس آنر کیس میں بعد از گرفتاری ضمانت منظور کر لی مضمون: لاہور ہائی کورٹ، لاہور کے ایک حالیہ فیصلے میں، کیس نمبر Crl. متفرق No.18392-B/2024، سید محمد علی نے F.I.R سے پیدا ہونے والے کیس میں بعد از گرفتاری ضمانت کی درخواست کی۔ نمبر 1042/2024 دفعہ 489-F PPC کے تحت پولیس سٹیشن رائیونڈ سٹی، ڈسٹرکٹ لاہور۔ درخواست گزار سید محمد علی نے شکایت کنندہ کو 32,00,000/- روپے کا چیک جاری کیا تھا جسے پیش کرنے پر بینک نے بے عزت کیا تھا۔ مقدمہ سیکشن 489-F PPC کے تحت درج کیا گیا تھا، جو قرض کی ادائیگی یا کسی ذمہ داری کو پورا کرنے کے لیے بے ایمانی سے چیک جاری کرنے سے متعلق ہے۔ دستیاب شواہد کی جانچ پڑتال پر، عدالت نے نوٹ کیا کہ یہ ثابت کرنے کے لیے ناکافی ثبوت موجود ہیں کہ چیک قرض کی ادائیگی یا کسی ذمہ داری کی تکمیل کے لیے جاری کیا گیا تھا۔ عدالت نے اس بات پر زور دیا کہ دفعہ 489-F PPC کا مقصد رقوم کی وصولی نہیں بلکہ بے ایمانی سے چیک جاری کرنے والوں کو سزا دینا ہے۔ عدالت نے مزید مشاہدہ کیا کہ درخواست گزار گرفتاری کے بعد سے جیل میں نظر بند تھا، اور محض نظر بندی سے
Post a Comment
Read more

Equal treatment with all NIRC members and

-
Image
NIRC  **Title: Ensuring Equal Treatment: Lahore High Court's Landmark Judgment on Perks and Privileges for Members of NIRC** **Introduction:** In a recent landmark judgment, the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, addressed the issue of discrimination in the provision of perks and privileges to Members of the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC). The case, Writ Petition No. 15368 of 2023, brought to light the fundamental principle of equality enshrined in Article 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973. **Background:** The petitioner, Munawar Hussain Toori, serving as a Member of NIRC, sought direction from the court to ensure parity in perks and privileges with other Members of NIRC, particularly those serving in different provinces. The petitioner argued that the differential treatment violated his constitutional right to equality. **Legal Arguments:** The petitioner's counsel contended that the petitioner, appointed on a contract basis, was entitled to perks and pri
Post a Comment
Read more

case laws related to auction proceedings not compliance with statutory provisions

-
Image
Title: Analysis of a Judicial Decision: Civil Revision No. 72449 of 2023 In a recent judgment by the Lahore High Court, Lahore, the case of Adnan Anwar versus Ijaz Ahmad & others was closely examined. The petitioner challenged the validity of a previous judgment that set aside the confirmation of an auction in his favor. Here's a breakdown of the judgment: Background: The dispute arose from a partition suit where the trial court decreed the suit and subsequently ordered an internal auction due to the absence of defendants. The auction was later challenged, leading to a series of legal proceedings culminating in the petitioner being declared the highest bidder for a commercial shop. Key Points: 1. Non-Compliance: The petitioner failed to deposit the remaining 80% of the bid amount within the stipulated time frame of 7 days, as mandated by law. 2. Legal Provisions: Section 11 of the Punjab Partition of Immoveable Property Act, 2012, clearly outlines the obligations of the highest
Post a Comment
Read more

failure to prove the pre-emption claim, citing deficiencies in pleadings, lack of evidence regarding notice issuance and service, and failure to comply with statutory requirements.

-
Image
Pre-emption claim  Title: Landmark Judgement: Lahore High Court Decision in C.R. No.1527-D of 2018 In a recent ruling by the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, a significant decision was made in Civil Revision No.1527-D of 2018 between Zafar Iqbal and Muhammad Amjad Shami. The judgement, delivered on April 18, 2024, by Justice Faisal Zaman Khan, addressed critical issues surrounding a suit for possession through pre-emption. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Muhammad Masood Bilal, Advocate, contested the judgments and decrees dated April 4, 2018, and September 8, 2018, passed by the civil judge and additional district judge, respectively, in Chichawatni. The suit for possession through pre-emption filed by the petitioner was dismissed by both courts, leading to the civil revision. The case revolved around divergent pleadings, with the petitioner claiming a superior right of pre-emption over the respondent. However, crucial discrepancies surfaced during the proceedings, casting doubt on
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lahore High Court ruled that Family Courts lack jurisdiction to adjudicate civil disputes outside the scope of family matters, emphasizing the importance of upholding legal authority and directing the transfer of civil cases to competent Civil Judges.

-
Image
Title: Understanding the Implications of Lahore High Court's Judgment on Jurisdiction of Family Courts In a recent ruling, the Lahore High Court, Judicial Department, addressed the crucial issue of jurisdiction concerning Family Courts in the Pakistani legal system. The judgment, handed down in Civil Revision No.54194 of 2023, sheds light on the interpretation of statutes governing the jurisdiction of Family Courts and the extent of their authority in adjudicating civil disputes. The case stemmed from a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Family Court to hear civil matters outside the scope of family disputes. The petitioners challenged an order issued by the District Judge, Pakpattan, which denied their application to withdraw civil cases from the Senior Civil Judge (Family Division) and transfer them to the Court of Civil Judge or Senior Civil Judge (Civil Division). The petitioners argued that the Family Courts Act, 1964, limited the jurisdiction of Family Courts to family disp
Post a Comment
Read more