more than one sentence of imprisonment passed against accused would run concurrently to each other”
Title: Understanding Concurrent Sentences: Analysis of Ishfaq Ahmad vs The State (2017 SCMR 307) Introduction: In the realm of criminal justice, the determination of sentences for multiple offenses committed by an individual is a complex and nuanced process. The case law reported in Ishfaq Ahmad vs The State (2017 SCMR 307) sheds light on the approach of the Supreme Court of Pakistan regarding concurrent sentences. This article aims to analyze the key observations made by the court in this landmark case and their implications on the administration of justice in Pakistan. Case Background: Ishfaq Ahmad vs The State (2017 SCMR 307) involved [provide a brief overview of the case background, including the offenses charged and the sentencing decision rendered by the court]. The central issue before the Supreme Court was the treatment of multiple sentences of imprisonment imposed on the accused. Key Observations of the Court: The Supreme Court of Pakistan, in its judgment, made a significant