(Acquittal in night-time murder) 1. : There was a discrepancy in the details of the shooting in the witness statements. 2. Failure to mention the lighting conditions: 3. Lack of correct identification of the place of shooting: 4. Failure to determine the time of shooting in the testimonies: 5. Lack of witness corroboration: 2024 Y L R 841(Acquittal in night-time murder) 1. : There was a discrepancy in the details of the shooting in the witness statements. 2. Failure to mention the lighting conditions: 3. Lack of correct identification of the place of shooting: 4. Failure to determine the time of shooting in the testimonies: 5. Lack of witness corroboration: 2024 Y L R 841
(Acquittal in night-time murder) 1. : There was a discrepancy in the details of the shooting in the witness statements. 2. Failure to mention the lighting conditions: 3. Lack of correct identification of the place of shooting: 4. Failure to determine the time of shooting in the testimonies: 5. Lack of witness corroboration: 2024 Y L R 841(Acquittal in night-time murder) 1. : There was a discrepancy in the details of the shooting in the witness statements. 2. Failure to mention the lighting conditions: 3. Lack of correct identification of the place of shooting: 4. Failure to determine the time of shooting in the testimonies: 5. Lack of witness corroboration: 2024 Y L R 841 اگر یہ برات کے خلاف اپیل تھی، تو اپیل عدالت نے جو فیصلہ دیا، وہ درج ذیل وجوہات پر مبنی ہو سکتا تھا: 1. گواہوں کی صداقت: اگر گواہوں کی گواہی میں کوئی اہم تضاد یا غلطی پائی گئی ہو، تو اپیل عدالت نے اس کو مدنظر رکھا۔ 2. شواہد کی درست تشخیص: اپیل عدالت نے یہ جانچنے کی کوشش کی کہ نچلی عدالت نے شواہد کی در...