Qanuni Amdad urdu

Writ is not maintainable if any other remedy available . RAWALPINDI BENCH, RAWALPINDI. JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT W.P.No.2154 of 2022 Syeda Farzana Batool, etc. Versus. Iltaf Hussain Shah, etc. JUDGMENT. Mirza Viqas Rauf, J. This petition under Article 199 of the  Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (hereinafter referred  to as “Constitution”) assails the vires of order dated 15th June, 2022  passed by the Member (Judicial-IV), Board of Revenue, Punjab in a  revision petition filed by the petitioners whereby he proceeded to dismiss  the petition being devoid of force and merits. This petition was admitted for  regular hearing by way of order dated 29th July, 2022, however, on  previous date a question was framed with regard to the maintainability of  this petition with the following observations: - “2. It appears that the constitutional petition is arising out  of order dated 15th June, 2022 passed by the Member (Judicial-IV)  Board of Revenue, Punjab Rawalpindi Camp on a r

Revision and writ is not maintainable against acquittal order in 249A crpc  The Lahore High Court dismissed the writ petition (No. 59534 of 2022) filed by Hajra Javaid Makhdoom. The petitioner had challenged the acquittal of Muhammad Tehmas Nasir under Section 249-A, Cr.P.C., arguing that the trial court's acquittal and subsequent dismissal of a criminal revision were incorrect. The court held that a criminal revision was not an appropriate remedy for challenging an acquittal under Section 249-A, as the proper remedy was an appeal under Section 417(2), Cr.P.C. The court further stated that constitutional petitions under Article 199 are not applicable for challenging orders of acquittal when specific statutory remedies are provided. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.  Form No: HCJD/C-121  ORDER SHEET IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE.  JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Writ Petition No. 59534 of 2022 Hajra Javaid Makhdoom Versus Muhammad Tehmas Nasir, etc. S.No. of order/  Proceeding Date