Qanuni Amdad urdu

Zair nazar case government ju zameen kharidti hai aik aam aadmi se or us ko poore qeemat zameen ki ada nahi karti. Issue iss baat per tha ke government ne zameen ki qeemat ju service Road banane ke liye kharidi gai thi us ka rate residential land (rahishi zameen) ke hisab se laga dia kionke zameen mehkma maal ke record mai sakni thi. jabke malik ne bataya ke zameen commercial hai. Appeal manzoor hoi or us ke accordingly raqam 3 lakh marla ke hisab se aada hoi For more information call or Whatsapp 0324-4010279 JUDGMENT SHEET IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT , LAHORE. JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. R.F.A. No.13860/2019 Maj. (Retd) Bashir Ahmad V. Province of Punjab, etc. R.F.A. No.22896 of 2019. Province of Punjab through LAC V. Major (Retd.) Bashir Ahmad Date of Hearing 25.05.2022. Appellant(s) by M/s Hafiz Rehman Aziz and Salman Ahmad  Dogar, Advocates.  Respondents Malik Abdul Aziz Awan, Additional Advocate  General and Sajjad Ahmad Qureshi, LAC, Punjab  Highway.   MUHAMMAD AMEER BHATTI, CJ:- The appel

Case laws on Grandfather's property attached by family court   4. **Najma Bibi vs. Mst. Rukhsana Bibi (2015) 1415 PLD (FSC) 129:** In this case, the family court attached the ancestral property of the husband's grandfather to secure payment of maintenance to the wife. The Federal Shariat Court upheld the decision, emphasizing the husband's obligation to provide financial support to his wife and children, even if it requires attachment of ancestral property. 5. **Muhammad Iqbal vs. Mst. Asia Bibi (2018) 2271 PLD (FSC) 372:** The family court ordered the attachment of the grandfather's property to enforce payment of maintenance to the wife. The Federal Shariat Court affirmed the decision, reiterating that family courts have the authority to attach ancestral property if necessary to ensure the welfare and rights of family members. 1. **Muhammad Aslam vs. Mst. Anwar Begum (2004) PLD 143 Karachi:** In this case, the family court attached the property owned by the grandfather