Rupt roznamcha waqiati | What is Section 42 of the Land Revenue Act
دعوئ استقرار حق میں انتقال وغیرہ کو چیلنج کیا جاتا وہاں اس دن کے رپٹ روزنامچہ کو بھی چیلنج کرنا ضروری ہے۔
Law deal to Roznamcha waqiati
**Understanding Section 42 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967**
Section 42 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967, plays a pivotal role in regulating land transactions and maintaining accurate land records in the province. This section outlines the procedure for reporting and recording acquisitions of land rights, ensuring transparency and legal compliance in property dealings.
**Reporting Requirements**
One of the key provisions of Section 42 is the obligation placed on individuals acquiring land rights, whether through inheritance, purchase, mortgage, gift, or any other means, to report such acquisitions to the designated Patwari within three months from the date of acquisition. This reporting requirement applies to both landowners and tenants with fixed-term leases exceeding one year.
**Recording in Roznamcha Waqiati**
Upon receiving the report, the Patwari is responsible for recording the acquisition in the Roznamcha Waqiati, also known as the Daily Diary Register, maintained in accordance with the prescribed rules. This register serves as a primary document for recording land transactions and is crucial for maintaining accurate land records at the local level.
**Compliance and Enforcement**
Section 42 also stipulates measures for compliance and enforcement. It requires the Patwari to furnish a copy of the recorded report to the reporting individual and send another copy to the relevant administrative office within a specified timeframe. Additionally, the Patwari is tasked with periodically verifying the correctness of entries in the register and taking appropriate action to rectify any discrepancies.
**Legal Significance**
The provisions of Section 42 underscore the importance of transparency and accountability in land transactions. By mandating timely reporting and accurate recording of acquisitions, the law aims to prevent disputes, fraud, and misrepresentation in property dealings. Compliance with Section 42 ensures that all stakeholders have access to reliable land records, facilitating efficient land administration and dispute resolution processes.
**Conclusion**
In essence, Section 42 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967, serves as a cornerstone of land governance in the province. Its provisions promote transparency, accountability, and legal compliance in land transactions, contributing to the overall integrity and stability of the land tenure system. Compliance with Section 42 is essential for maintaining accurate land records and ensuring the smooth functioning of property markets and land administration processes.
Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati in Pakistan's Land Revenue System
Introduction:
Within Pakistan's land revenue system, the Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati holds a pivotal role, serving as a cornerstone for documentation, transparency, and accountability. This intricate term encompasses the daily record-keeping practices vital for effective land revenue administration. Delving into its significance sheds light on the mechanisms driving Pakistan's land revenue management.
Understanding Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati:
The term "Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati" translates to "authenticated daily diary" and embodies the meticulous recording of land revenue-related transactions. Its purpose extends beyond mere documentation, encompassing broader objectives essential for land revenue governance:
1. Comprehensive Record-Keeping: The Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati serves as a comprehensive ledger, capturing all land revenue transactions, including assessments, collections, transfers, and disputes. Each entry is meticulously recorded, providing a detailed account of revenue-related activities.
2. Transparency and Accountability: By maintaining transparent records, the system fosters accountability among revenue officials and landowners alike. Every transaction is documented, leaving little room for ambiguity or manipulation, thereby ensuring integrity in land revenue administration.
3. Legal Compliance: In addition to facilitating day-to-day operations, the Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati serves as legal documentation, offering a basis for resolving disputes and addressing legal challenges. Its authenticated nature lends credibility to the recorded transactions, reinforcing compliance with legal requirements.
Components and Functionality:
The Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati comprises essential components that contribute to its functionality within the land revenue system:
1. Date and Time Stamp: Each entry in the daily diary includes the date and time of the transaction, enabling chronological tracking of land revenue activities.
2. Details of Transactions: The nature of each transaction, whether it involves land assessments, revenue collection, or disputes, is meticulously documented for reference.
3. Financial Implications: The diary records the monetary aspects of each transaction, including assessment values, revenue dues, fines, and penalties, providing clarity on financial matters.
4. Parties Involved: Details of the parties involved in land revenue transactions, such as landowners, tenants, revenue officials, and government representatives, are recorded to establish accountability and traceability.
5. Authentication Mechanisms: To ensure the authenticity of records, entries in the Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati are authenticated through signatures, seals, or other official endorsements, enhancing the credibility of the documented transactions.
Role in Land Revenue Administration:
The Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati plays a multifaceted role in land revenue administration, offering several benefits:
1. Monitoring Revenue Performance: Revenue officials can track land revenue collections and assessments by referring to the daily diary, enabling timely interventions to address discrepancies or revenue shortfalls.
2. Dispute Resolution: In cases of land revenue disputes or discrepancies, the authenticated records serve as evidence, facilitating fair and efficient resolution processes.
3. Policy Formulation: Analysis of data recorded in the Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati enables policymakers to identify trends, assess revenue performance, and formulate effective land revenue policies and strategies.
عنوان: پاکستان کے لینڈ ریونیو سسٹم میں راپت روزنامچہ وقیاتی کی اہمیت کو کھولنا
تعارف:
پاکستان کے زمینی محصولات کے نظام کے اندر، روپت روزنامچہ وقیاتی ایک اہم کردار کی حامل ہے، جو دستاویزات، شفافیت اور جوابدہی کے لیے سنگ بنیاد کے طور پر کام کرتی ہے۔ اس پیچیدہ اصطلاح میں روزانہ ریکارڈ رکھنے کے طریقوں کو شامل کیا گیا ہے جو لینڈ ریونیو کے موثر انتظام کے لیے ضروری ہیں۔ اس کی اہمیت کو جاننے سے پاکستان کے زمینی محصول کے انتظام کو چلانے والے طریقہ کار پر روشنی پڑتی ہے۔
Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati کو سمجھنا:
اصطلاح "روپت روزنامچہ وقیاتی" کا ترجمہ "مصدقہ روزانہ کی ڈائری" میں ہوتا ہے اور زمین کی آمدنی سے متعلق لین دین کی پیچیدہ ریکارڈنگ کو مجسم کرتا ہے۔ اس کا مقصد محض دستاویزات سے آگے بڑھتا ہے، جس میں وسیع تر مقاصد کو شامل کیا جاتا ہے جو زمینی محصول کی حکمرانی کے لیے ضروری ہیں:
1. جامع ریکارڈ کیپنگ: روپت روزنامچہ وقیاتی ایک جامع لیجر کے طور پر کام کرتا ہے، جو کہ زمینی محصولات کے تمام لین دین کو پکڑتا ہے، بشمول تشخیص، وصولی، منتقلی اور تنازعات۔ ہر اندراج کو احتیاط کے ساتھ ریکارڈ کیا جاتا ہے، جس میں آمدنی سے متعلق سرگرمیوں کا تفصیلی حساب ہوتا ہے۔
2. شفافیت اور جوابدہی: شفاف ریکارڈ کو برقرار رکھنے سے، یہ نظام ریونیو اہلکاروں اور زمینداروں کے درمیان یکساں احتساب کو فروغ دیتا ہے۔ ہر لین دین کو دستاویزی شکل دی جاتی ہے، جس میں ابہام یا ہیرا پھیری کی بہت کم گنجائش باقی رہ جاتی ہے، اس طرح لینڈ ریونیو ایڈمنسٹریشن میں دیانتداری کو یقینی بنایا جاتا ہے۔
3. قانونی تعمیل: روزمرہ کی کارروائیوں میں سہولت فراہم کرنے کے علاوہ، روپت روزنامچہ وقیاتی قانونی دستاویزات کے طور پر کام کرتی ہے، جو تنازعات کو حل کرنے اور قانونی چیلنجوں سے نمٹنے کی بنیاد فراہم کرتی ہے۔ اس کی توثیق شدہ نوعیت قانونی تقاضوں کی تعمیل کو تقویت دیتے ہوئے، ریکارڈ شدہ لین دین کو اعتبار فراہم کرتی ہے۔
اجزاء اور فعالیت:
Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati ضروری اجزاء پر مشتمل ہے جو زمینی محصول کے نظام میں اس کی فعالیت میں حصہ ڈالتے ہیں:
1. تاریخ اور وقت کا ڈاک ٹکٹ: روزانہ کی ڈائری میں ہر اندراج میں لین دین کی تاریخ اور وقت شامل ہوتا ہے، جس سے زمین کی آمدنی کی سرگرمیوں کی تاریخ سے باخبر رہنا ممکن ہوتا ہے۔
2. لین دین کی تفصیلات: ہر لین دین کی نوعیت، خواہ اس میں زمین کی تشخیص، محصولات کی وصولی، یا تنازعات شامل ہوں، حوالہ کے لیے احتیاط سے دستاویز کی جاتی ہے۔
3. مالیاتی اثرات: ڈائری ہر لین دین کے مالیاتی پہلوؤں کو ریکارڈ کرتی ہے، بشمول تشخیصی اقدار، محصول کے واجبات، جرمانے، اور جرمانے، مالی معاملات پر وضاحت فراہم کرتے ہیں۔
4. ملوث فریق: زمینی محصولات کے لین دین میں ملوث فریقین کی تفصیلات، جیسے کہ زمین کے مالکان، کرایہ داروں، محصولات کے اہلکار، اور حکومتی نمائندے، احتساب اور سراغ لگانے کے لیے ریکارڈ کیے جاتے ہیں۔
5. تصدیقی طریقہ کار: ریکارڈ کی صداقت کو یقینی بنانے کے لیے، روپت روزنامچہ وقیعت میں اندراجات کی تصدیق دستخطوں، مہروں، یا دیگر سرکاری توثیق کے ذریعے کی جاتی ہے، جس سے دستاویزی لین دین کی ساکھ میں اضافہ ہوتا ہے۔
لینڈ ریونیو ایڈمنسٹریشن میں کردار:
روپت روزنامچہ وقیاتی زمینی محصولات کے انتظام میں کثیر جہتی کردار ادا کرتا ہے، جس میں کئی فوائد ہیں:
1. محصولات کی کارکردگی کی نگرانی: محصولات کے اہلکار روزانہ کی ڈائری کا حوالہ دے کر زمینی محصولات کی وصولی اور تخمینہ کا پتہ لگا سکتے ہیں، جس سے تضادات یا محصولات کی کمی کو دور کرنے کے لیے بروقت مداخلت کو ممکن بنایا جا سکتا ہے۔
2. تنازعات کا حل: زمینی ریونیو کے تنازعات یا تضادات کے معاملات میں، تصدیق شدہ ریکارڈ ثبوت کے طور پر کام کرتا ہے، منصفانہ اور موثر حل کے عمل میں سہولت فراہم کرتا ہے۔
3. پالیسی کی تشکیل: روپت روزنامچہ وقیاتی میں ریکارڈ کردہ ڈیٹا کا تجزیہ پالیسی سازوں کو رجحانات کی نشاندہی کرنے، محصول کی کارکردگی کا جائزہ لینے اور زمینی محصول کی مؤثر پالیسیاں اور حکمت عملی بنانے کے قابل بناتا ہے۔
نتیجہ:
پاکستان کے زمینی محصولات کے نظام کے دائرے میں، روپت روزنامچہ وقیعت دستاویزات، شفافیت اور جوابدہی کے لیے ایک بنیادی آلے کے طور پر ابھرتا ہے۔ اس کا کردار محض ریکارڈ رکھنے سے آگے بڑھتا ہے، جس میں وسیع تر مقاصد جیسے قانونی تعمیل، تنازعات کا حل، اور پالیسی کی تشکیل شامل ہے۔ اس کی اہمیت کو سمجھنا لینڈ ریونیو ایڈمنسٹریشن میں شامل اسٹیک ہولڈرز کے لیے بہت ضروری ہے، ملک کے زمینی وسائل کے انتظام میں دیانتداری اور کارکردگی کو یقینی بنانا۔
Conclusion:
In the realm of Pakistan's land revenue system, the Rupat Roznamcha Waqiati emerges as a fundamental instrument for documentation, transparency, and accountability. Its role extends beyond mere record-keeping, encompassing broader objectives such as legal compliance, dispute resolution, and policy formulation. Understanding its significance is crucial for stakeholders involved in land revenue administration, ensuring integrity and efficiency in managing the country's land resources.
High Court case law on roznamcha waqiati .
The High Court emphasized the importance of the Roznamcha Waqiati (Daily Diary) maintained by the Patwari in documenting land transactions. It highlighted that according to Section 42 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967, any acquisition of land rights, including through gift, must be reported to the Patwari within three months. The Patwari is then required to record this information in the Roznamcha Waqiati.
The judgment underscored that entries in the Roznamcha Waqiati serve as crucial evidence of land transactions, including gifts. It highlighted that the failure to produce Roznamcha Waqiati or provide evidence of transactions recorded therein can weaken a party's claim in a land dispute case.
The court cited judicial precedents to emphasize the importance of Roznamcha Waqiati as primary evidence of land transactions, highlighting that reliance solely on mutation sheets or oral evidence without corroborating entries in Roznamcha Waqiati may not suffice to establish the validity of a transaction.
In summary, the High Court emphasized that entries in the Roznamcha Waqiati are vital in establishing the authenticity and validity of land transactions, including gifts, and failure to produce or provide evidence from Roznamcha Waqiati can weaken a party's claim in court.
JUDGMENT SHEET
IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Civil Revision No.2374 of 2012
Mst. Khanai and others.
Vs.
Ghulam Rasool and others.
Date of Hearing 17.11.2021
Petitioners by
M/s Fayyaz Ahmad Kaleem and Waheed Ashraf Bhatti,
Advocates.
Respondents by Mr. Muhammad Ashraf, Advocate for the respondents.
MUHAMMAD AMEER BHATTI, CJ:- This revision
petition is directed against the judgment dated 11.07.2012, whereby the
learned District Judge, Bhakkar, while accepting the appeal, preferred by
the respondents, set-aside the judgment and decree dated 09.06.2010 of
the learned trial Court dismissing petitioners’ suit.
2.
Brief facts significant to the case are that the property-indispute, originally owned by Zamma (ذمہ), the predecessor-in-interest of
both the parties, was got transferred by Mst. Khanai, his daughter, through
gift mutation No.42 dated 23.12.1993. The deceased respondent-plaintiff
namely Mst. Shahzado represented by her legal heirs, who was also the
daughter of said Zamma, after his death, instituted a declaratory suit
seeking to annul the said gift mutation being obtained by practicing fraud
and misrepresentation. The petitioners-defendants filed written statement
specifically alleging therein that the property-land was transferred by the
owner in lieu of the services she (Mst. Khanai) rendered to her father
through gift mutation, which was sanctioned with consent of the original
owner and there was no fraud and misrepresentation. Divergent pleadings
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
2
of the parties persuaded the learned trial Court to frame the following
issues:-
1.
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the decree for declaration
as prayed for?OPP
2.
Whether the mutation No.42 dated 23.12.1993 is against law
and facts, without notice, without hearing, without authority
and consideration, based on fraud and ineffective and
inoperative upon the rights of the plaintiff?OPP
3.
Whether the suit is not maintainable in its present form?OPD
4.
Whether the plaintiff has no cause of action to file this
suit?OPD
5.
Whether the suit is time barred?OPD
6.
Whether the suit is false, frivolous and the defendants are
entitled to recover special costs u/s 35-A CPC?OPD 1-2
7.
Relief.
The learned trial Court after recording evidence of both the parties
dismissed the respondents’ suit vide judgment and decree dated
09.06.2010, who preferred an appeal, which was accepted by the learned
District Judge, Bhakkar, vide his judgment and decree dated 11.07.2012,
as a result whereof the suit of the plaintiffs-respondents was decreed to
the extent of their shares; hence, this revision petition.
3.
I have heard the learned counsels for the parties and gone
through record of the case.
4.
Although the learned District Judge while accepting appeal
of the respondents-plaintiffs after duly examining-discussing the evidence
led by the parties has rightly concluded that the respondents-plaintiffs
have been deprived of their legitimate rights of inheritance through
concealed transaction of purported gift, yet, I deem it appropriate to add
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
3
that while filing the written statement the petitioners-defendants did not
specify the date, time and place with regard to performance/fulfillment of
ingredients of a valid gift, i.e. offer, acceptance and handing-over
possession; it was asserted explicitly that the land-in-dispute was
transferred by the owner with his free will and consent through gift and
possession was handed over. This was a vague assertion without any
specification regarding offer, acceptance and handing-over possession
with date, time and place and evidence in this regard is also not
confidence inspiring.
The law stipulates three essential requirements for transaction of a
valid gift in one sitting. It is also settled law that any transaction of the
land/property through gift which is alleged to have been made by
practicing fraud and misrepresentation, the burden to prove its
authenticity and validity always lies on the beneficiary who is required to
produce the direct confidence inspiring evidence relating to fulfillment of
basic ingredients of valid transaction of gift, i.e., offer, acceptance and
delivery of possession. If anyone of these ingredients is found missing, it
would be fatal for the claimant as held by honourable Supreme Court in a
case reported as Peer Baksh through LTs and others v. Mst. Khanzadi and
others (2016 SCMR 1417), relevant portion thereof is reproduced
hereunder:-
“The petitioner was under an obligation to establish the
ingredients of the gift claimed by him under the impugned
mutations. However, no particulars whatsoever of the time,
date, place and witnesses of the declaration of the gift made
by Ghulam Muhammad deceased in favour of the petitioner
have been provided in his pleadings nor any evidence could
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
4
be produced by him in this behalf. This is fatal to the
petitioner’s plea.”
5.
The case of the petitioners-defendants is only based on gift
mutation which is silent with regard to its ingredients; it also does not
have any information about date, time and place. Before sanctioning of
mutation Patwari has to incorporate desire of the parties as a report in the
Roznamcha Waqiati. It signifies that the parties have made their offer,
acceptance and handing-over the possession before the Patwari about
completion/fulfillment of transaction alongwith all particulars narrating
the detail of transaction in the Roznamcha. However, if the parties had
made it at any other place, on different time and date, then all the
particulars of that transaction should, on their narration, be incorporated in
the Roznamcha Waqiati.
The Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967, hereinafter to be referred as
“the Act”, which was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to
the making and maintenance of records-of-rights, the assessment and
collection of land-revenue, the appointment and functions of Revenue
Officers and other matters connected with the Land Revenue
Administration in Province of the Punjab, laid down a comprehensive
procedure for preparation of Record of Rights and Periodical Records. It
is necessary and incumbent upon a person who by any mean including of
gift, acquires any right in an estate as a land-owner to mandatorily report
his acquisition of right to the Patwari of the estate within three months
from the date of such acquisition who is bound to record the very fact in
the Roznamcha as maintained by him in accordance with The Punjab
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
5
Land Revenue Rules, 1968. For the sake of ready reference relevant
provision is reproduced hereunder:-
S. 42. Making of that part of periodical records which
relates to land-owners.– (1) Subject to the other provisions
of this Chapter, a person] acquiring by inheritance,
purchase, mortgage, gift, or otherwise, any right in an estate
as a land-owner, or a tenant for a fixed term exceeding one
year, shall, within three months from the date of such
acquisition, report his acquisition of right to the Patwari of
the estate, who shall–
(a)
record such report in the Roznamacha to be
maintained in the prescribed manner;
(b) furnish a copy of the report so recorded, free of
cost, to the person making the report; and
(c)
send a copy of the report, within a week of its
receipt by him, to the office of the Union
Administration] within which the estate is situated.
(2)
If the person acquiring the right is a minor or is
otherwise unable to report, his guardian or other person
having charge of his property shall make the report to the
Patwari.
(3)
The Patwari shall enter in his register of mutations
every report made to him under sub-section (1) or subsection (2), and shall also make an entry in the Roznamcha
and in the register of mutations respecting the acquisition of
any such right as aforesaid which he has reason to believe to
have taken place, and of which report should have been
made to him under either of those sub-sections and has not
been so made.
(4)
The report made to the Patwari under sub-section (1)
or sub-section (2) or recorded by him under sub-section (3)
shall be displayed in such manner as may be prescribed.
(5)
If the Patwari fails to record or to display a report
made to him under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), the
person making the report may make the report, in writing, to
the Revenue Officer concerned and the Union Nazim of the
Union in which the estate is situated, by registered post
acknowledgement due and the Revenue Officer shall
thereupon cause such report to be entered in the register of
mutations.
(6)
A Revenue Officer shall, from time to time, inquire into
the correctness of all entries in the register of mutations and into
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
6
all such acquisitions as aforesaid coming to his knowledge of
which, under the foregoing sub-sections, report should have
been made to the Patwari and entries made in that register, and,
shall in each case make such order as he thinks fit with respect
to any entry in the periodical record of the right acquired.
(7)
……
(8)
……
(9)
……
(10) ……
(11) ……
Mere perusal of Section 42 ibid shows that it is obligatory upon a
person who acquires a right in the immovable property within an estate
as a landowner by way of gift or otherwise to report this factum to the
concerned Patwari within the time period of three months from the
acquisition of such right, who is bound under the law to record the same
in Roznamcha Waqiati. The importance and significance of entry in the
Roznamcha Waqiati is clearly palpable from the fact that in the scheme
of Revenue Administration under the Act, the factum of having acquired
any interest as landowner in the land of a particular estate is firstly
recorded in the Roznamcha. The culmination point in the form of
sanctioned mutation is always an outcome of the initial entry duly
recorded in the Roznamcha Waqiati by the Patwari and there is no other
option except to follow the procedure provided under the Land Revenue
Act, 1967.
Rule 34 of West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules also stipulates that
Patwari is to maintain Roznamcha Waqiati (Daily Diary) under clause (a)
of sub section (1) of section 42, in accordance with the Form XX,
wherein five columns are provided to specifically state serial number,
date, heading of entry, occurrence and remarks. In order to further ensure
correctness and authenticity of the information recorded in the said
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
7
Diary, Sub-Rule 3 also made it obligatory that the Patwari shall prefix to
every entry, in the Roznamcha a separate serial number, in large and
clear figures. Every entry shall be closed by an asterisk, and no blank line
shall be left between two consecutive entries. It also stipulates that such
orders and instructions as relate to rules of practice, shall be entered in
red ink and the date of each day's entries shall be given according to the
official calendar.
The signification of entry in Roznamcha Waqiati of Patwari can be
well understood from the Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in the
case GHULAM MUSTAFA through LRs. and others Versus
MUHAMMAD YAHYA and others (2013 S C M R 684) wherein the
importance of Rozmancha Waqiati of Patwari is highlighted to prove the
factum of possession of land. The Court ruled as under:-
On his own showing Fateh Muhammad was in
possession of the suit land in his capacity as a lessee but the
change of his status into an owner could neither be proved by
any document nor it is so reflected in the revenue record i.e.
Roznamcha Waqiati of Patwari.
Similarly the importance of Roznamcha Waqiati stood further
established from the esteemed judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court
ZULFIQAR and others Versus SHAHADAT KHAN (P L D 2007
Supreme Court 582) wherein it was held as follows:-
“From perusal of the record, we find that Roznamcha
Waqiati was not produced instead reliance was placed on a
note incorporated on the mutation sheet. The aforesaid not
was not even primary evidence of the contents of Roznamcha
Waqiati. We have also noticed that neither Roznamcha
Waqiate was produced nor Muhammad Azeem, the vendor
was examined. The reference to Roznamcha Waqiati on the
mutation sheet did not constitute any evidence at all of the
sale
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
8
The Apex Court further held:-
16. As noted above, copy of the Roznamcha Waqiati was
neither produced nor the vendor or the Parwari was
examined. Therefore, the entry in the mutations referring to
the report recorded in Roznamcha Waqiati was not the
primary evidence. Although Roznamcha Waqiati is required
to be maintained under the West Pakistan Land Revenue
Rules, 1968 and entry made during the course of
performance of official duty is admissible yet if the report
contains the statement of a private individual, it is required
to be proved to establish its correctness. It may also be noted
here that under section 42 of the West Pakistan Land
Revenue Act, 1967 it is the person acquiring a right in the
land who has to make such a report to the Patwari Halqa.
The importance of Roznamcha is further established and
highlighted from the recent judgment of this Court in the case Sheikh
RAUF AHMAD Versus Dr. NAZIR SAEED, MEMBER (JUDICIALV), BOARD OF REVENUE (2020 Y L R Note 52), wherein it was
also laid down as under:-
“From the perusal of the aforesaid provisions it is very
much clear that any person acquiring any right as a
purchaser, inheritor, donee, mortgagee or otherwise in any
estate, the Patwari shall record such report in Roznamcha
to be maintained in the prescribed manner furnished copy
of report within a week to concerned Town Committee or
Union Council and subsection (3) of section 42, the
Patwari shall enter in his register of mutations every
report made to him under subsection (1) or subsection (2)
of section 42 and shall also make an entry in the
Roznamcha and in the register of mutations regarding the
acquisition of any such right as aforesaid which he has
reason to believe to have taken place, and of which report
should have been made to him under either of those
subsections and has not been so made.”
In light of the above discussion, it can be safely held that Roznamcha
Waqiati is the first document wherein the fact of acquiring any right and
ownership in the immovable property through any mode, including of gift,
is ought to be recorded as per statutory command of Section 42 of the Act
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
9
and Rule 34 of the Rules respectively. If a person claims to have acquired
ownership through gift in a land of an estate, then he is required to prove
that his/her claim was duly brought before the Patwari to be recorded in
the Roznamcha for subsequent entry of mutation and sanctioning thereof
and then its ultimate incorporation in the Periodical Records of such an
estate, failure of which seriously jeopardizes his/her claim and makes it
non est.
The petitioners-defendants did not plead with particulars relating to
performance of gift in their written statement which is sine qua non and
silence of record about performance of three essential ingredients of gift
besides omission of its date, time and place, makes the transaction non
est. Even otherwise missing of all these essential ingredients from written
statement alongwith date, time and place of its performance was enough
to annul the transaction/mutation as it is settled law that no party to lis be
allowed to lead evidence beyond pleadings nor could it be read in
evidence although in the present case no such evidence was produced and
available on record to prove that the essential ingredients for a valid gift
were performed/fulfilled.
This Court specifically inquired from the learned counsel for the
petitioners/defendants that the Patwari initiated the process/sanctioning of
gift mutation on desire of the parties, which fact according to the revenue
laws is necessarily to be recorded in Roznamcha Waqiati and on the basis
of that entry he initiated the process of sanctioning of mutation by
incorporating the relevant abstract of their statements recorded in
Roznamcha Waqiati in column No.14 of mutation besides entering the
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
10
other particulars in other columns of the mutation form adding the other
particulars relating to land and its ownership, hence that Roznamcha
Waqiati was the most important evidence/document to find-out particulars
of performance of valid gift to transfer the land on the terms settled
between the parties which was not produced by the beneficiaries for
reasons best known to them. Oral evidence is also silent with regard to
performance of offer, acceptance and delivery of possession hence he
could not refer any evidence in this regard.
It is also noticed that the sanctioning officer at the time of
sanctioning of mutation did not mention regarding performance of the
necessary ingredients either before him or narrated by the parties before
him about completion of ingredients of gift at any other place, time and
date except confirming of handing-over possession of the land-in-dispute
without any particular; meaning thereby that the transaction might have
been materialized earlier either before the Patwari when he penned
statements of the parties in the Roznamcha Waqiati, which was not
produced and withheld by the petitioners-defendants or anywhere else but
no evidence in this regard is available on record.
In the recent dictum laid down by the apex Court reported in Atta
Muhammad and others v. Mst. Munir Sultan (deceased) through her LRs
and others (2021 SCMR 73), it has been held that,
“The burden of proof to establish the gifts was on the
beneficiaries of the gifts, not the donees. However, two of the
donees, namely, Mohammad Akram and Mst. Naik Bakht did
not testify and only Atta Mohammad testified, but he did not
testify as an attorney of the other two donees. The material
particulars of the gifts, including when and where the lands
were gifted, accepted and possession of the lands delivered
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
11
was not mentioned in the gift mutations, in the roznamcha
waqiati (daily diary register), in the written statement or any
other document. The burden to prove the gifts was on the
petitioners who failed to discharge such burden. The gifts
were also extremely suspect, having purportedly been made
by an extremely old gentleman of over ninety years of age
who was in poor health and also on whose state of mind
serious questions had been raised. It is also inexplicable why
he would want to deprive five of his daughters from his
inheritance.”
6.
It is also settled law, as per dictum laid down by Hon’ble
Supreme Court in a case reported as “Muhammad Shafi and others vs.
Sultan Mahmood and others” (2010 SCMR 827) and “Muhammad
Hassan vs. Khawaja Khalil-ur-Rehman” (2007 SCMR 576) wherein it
has been held:
“In case of divergent findings of the two Courts below, the
High Court will have to give due attention to the findings of
the Appellate Court unless it suffers from grave irregularity
or the same are perverse or the reasons given by the
Appellate Court are not sustainable. Moreover, that was a
revision petition before it which is a discretionary
jurisdiction and the exercise undertaken by the High Court
meets the said requirement.”
7.
In view of the guidelines given by apex Court in cited case, I
have minutely examined the evidence besides contents of the written
statement and do not find anything mentioned by the petitionersdefendants in the written statements or elaborated through evidence,
which has been claimed to have been misread and misconstrued,
necessary to prove the essential ingredients of a purported gift, therefore,
the claim of the petitioners before this Court for interference in the
judgment of the learned first appellate Court is not justified. The learned
first Appellate Court has neither committed any illegality or irregularity
Civil Revision No.2374-2012
12
nor the findings are perverse and reasons recorded therein are in
conformity with law as well as evidence available on record, therefore, I
have no option except to decline exercise of the power provided under
Section 115, C.P.C. Resultantly, this petition has no merits and dismissed
with no order as to costs.
(MUHAMMAD AMEER BHATTI)
CHIEF JUSTICE
Approved for reporting.
CHIE
Comments
Post a Comment