Withdrawal of suit |Claim return request rejected The High Court termed the decision of the lower courts as invalid and illegal, saying that the petition of the plaintiffs did not mention formal defects and reasonable reasons and the lower court had allowed the case to be withdrawn without fulfilling the legal requirements, therefore the High Court set aside the judgments of both the subordinate courts. 2024 C L C 262

-


Claim return request rejected
The High Court termed the decision of the lower courts as invalid and illegal, saying that the petition of the plaintiffs did not mention formal defects and reasonable reasons and the lower court had allowed the case to be withdrawn without fulfilling the legal requirements, therefore the High Court set aside the judgments of both the subordinate courts.
2024 C L C 262




جی ہاں، کیس واپسی کی درخواست کا ایشو ہائیکورٹ تک پہنچا۔ ہائیکورٹ نے نچلی عدالت کے فیصلے کو غلط اور غیر قانونی قرار دیتے ہوئے، اس درخواست کو مسترد کر دیا۔ ہائیکورٹ نے کہا کہ مدعیوں کی درخواست میں ضروری قانونی وجوہات کا ذکر نہیں تھا اور نچلی عدالت نے قانونی تقاضوں کو پورا کیے بغیر کیس واپسی کی اجازت دے دی تھی، اس لیے ہائیکورٹ نے دونوں ماتحت عدالتوں کے فیصلوں کو منسوخ کر دیا۔


2024 C L C 262

[Balochistan]

Before Gul Hassan Tareen, J

BISMILLAH and 2 others----Petitioners

Versus

NAIK MUHAMMAD through Legal Heirs----Respondents

Civil Revision No.813 of 2021, decided on 17th March, 2023.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---

----O. XXIII, Rr. 1 & 2 & O. XIII, R. 2---Conditional withdrawal of suit, permission of---Formal defect, absence of---Order of the Court not containing legal reasoning---Effect---Trial Court allowed application moved by the plaintiffs for conditional withdrawal with conditional cost, which order was maintained by the Appellate Court---Contention of the petitioner/ defendant was that application made by the respondents / plaintiffs did not disclose 'formal defect' as they had stated that they were not in possession of some material documents in respect of suit-property and whenever they would be in possession of said documents, they would file a fresh suit---Validity---In an application for conditional withdrawal of suit, 'formal defect' or 'any other sufficient ground' must be mentioned as per O.XXIII, R.1(2)(a) & (b) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, whereas in the present case, respondents / plaintiffs could have collected the required documents to place the same on the record under O. XIII, R. 2 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, thus the reason (documents not being in possession) having been mentioned by the respondent / plaintiffs in their application did not amount to 'formal defect' or 'any other sufficient ground'---Impugned order passed by the Trial Court was brief and non-speaking---Not only an application for conditional withdrawal of suit must contain 'formal defect' but the order passed by the Court must contain legal reasoning also while granting such an application---Application made by the respondents was reason and was liable to be dismissed---Trial Court completely overlooked the contents of the application and provisions of O. XXIII, R. 1 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908---Perusal of impugned order revealed that the Trial Court had not applied at all its judicious mind to the facts as well as the law on the subject; and in a slipshot manner allowed the application of the respondents / plaintiffs---Error committed by he Trial Court was not merely a material illegality but suffered from jurisdictional error and material irregularity---Petitioner assailed the impugned order in appeal; however, the Appellate Court had repeated the same illegality and failed to exercise jurisdiction vested in it by law as such, the impugned orders and judgments attracted the provisions of S.115(1) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908---High Court set-aside impugned orders and judgments passed by both the Courts below---Consequently the application made by the respondent / plaintiffs for conditional withdrawal of the suit stood rejected---Revision was allowed, in circumstances.

       Muhammad Yar (Deceased) through L.Rs. and others v. Muhammad Amin (Deceased) through L.Rs. and others 2013 SCMR 464 and Sharaf-ud-Din v. Abdul Wadood and 3 others, 2022 CLC 1282 ref.

       Atta Muhammad Tareen and Najeebullah Kakar for Petitioner.

       Jamal Khan Lashari for Respondents Nos.1A to 1-E and 3 and Abdul Tahir, State Counsel for Respondent No.4.

 

For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.




  













 



 







































 



































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Property ki taqseem ,Warasat main warson ka hisa

-
Image
Inheritance properties distribution  What is the new law of inheritance in Pakistan? As o. Here are some key points regarding inheritance in Pakistan: 1. **Islamic Inheritance Laws:**    - Pakistan follows the principles of Islamic inheritance, as outlined in the Quran. These laws dictate the distribution of an individual's assets among heirs. 2. **Intestate Succession:**    - If a person dies without a will (intestate), the distribution of the estate is guided by Islamic inheritance laws. 3. **Heirs:**    - Common heirs include spouses, children, parents, and other close relatives. The specific shares of each heir are determined by Islamic rules. 4. **Wills:**    - While Islamic inheritance principles are followed in the absence of a will, individuals have the option to draft a will to specify how they want their assets distributed. However, the will must not contradict Islamic inheritance laws. 5. **Legal Assistance:**    - It's...
Read more

Punishment for violation of section 144 crpc | dafa 144 in Pakistan means,kia hai , khalaf warzi per kitni punishment hu gi،kab or kese lagai ja ja sakti hai.

-
Image
How to enforce  section 144 "Dafa 144" is a term used in Pakistan to refer to Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code. When authorities impose Dafa 144, it means that they are prohibiting the assembly of a certain number of people in a specific area to maintain public order and prevent disturbances. Dafa 144 meaning in Urdu "Dafa 144" ایک اصطلاح ہے جو پاکستان میں ضابطہ فوجداری کی دفعہ 144 کے لیے استعمال ہوتی ہے۔ جب حکام دفا 144 نافذ کرتے ہیں، تو اس کا مطلب یہ ہوتا ہے کہ وہ امن عامہ کو برقرار رکھنے اور خلل کو روکنے کے لیے مخصوص علاقے میں لوگوں کی ایک خاص تعداد کے جمع ہونے پر پابندی لگا رہے ہیں۔  144 or section 144 Aksar dekha gia hai ke dafa. 144 ka nafaz kia jata hai magar humare logo ke zahan ma swalat uthte hain ke ye section kia hai , kab or kio lagai jati hai. Saza kia hu gi .agar koi banda section 144 ki khalaf warzi karta hai. Section 144 ki khalaf warzi per 6 month qaid or jurmana ki saza hu sakti ha. Under section 188 ppc 144 section or 188 section parhai...
Read more

Bachon ki custody of minors after divorce or separation

-
Image
Custody procedure of kids through court  PLD 2023 Lahore 433 Constitutional petition against an order passed under S. 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act , 1890 , for the grant of interim custody is maintainable because the remedy of appeal against such an order is not available , as per S. 14 ( 3 ) of the Family Courts Act. Interim custody of minor --- Scope --- Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act , 1890 , enacts the power to make interlocutory order for production of minor and interim protection of person and property .  Childern Custody after divorce or separation through Guardian court                                     videos main detail batai gai hai . Aisa iqrarnama jiss main walda apne khazanat ke haq main dastbardari show kar rahi hu bilkul ghair qanooni hai.(PLD 2024 supreme Court 291) Ajj hum Baat karain ge bachon ki custody ko le ke jo ke aik buhat nazak mas...
Read more