Permanent injunction | The civil court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the petitioner, but the appellate court quashed the decision for lack of description of the property. However, the High Court allowed the appeal and ruled that despite the lack of description of the property, the injunction can be maintained if the claim is strong. 2024 C L C 381

-

The civil court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the petitioner, but the appellate court quashed the decision for lack of description of the property. However, the High Court allowed the appeal and ruled that despite the lack of description of the property, the injunction can be maintained if the claim is strong.
2024 C L C 381





اہم نکات:

1. مستقل حکم امتناعی: درخواست دائمی حکم امتناعی کے حوالے سے دائر کی گئی تھی۔ بنیادی عدالت نے درخواست گزار کے حق میں فیصلہ دیا، مگر اپیلیٹ عدالت نے اس بنیاد پر فیصلے سے اختلاف کیا کہ درخواست گزار جائیداد کی درست تفصیل پیش کرنے میں ناکام رہے۔


2. جائیداد کی تفصیل کی عدم موجودگی: درخواست گزار نے دعویٰ کیا کہ وہ جائیداد پر قابض ہیں، اور دعوے کے ثبوت کے طور پر جمع بندری کی نقل پیش کی، جس میں 7 مرلے کے رقبے پر درخواست گزار اور نچلی عدالت کے گواہوں کے قبضے کو ظاہر کیا گیا تھا۔


3. دستاویزی ثبوت: متعلقہ دستاویزات جیسے کہ جمع بندی اور گرداوری میں درخواست گزار کے قبضے کو ثابت کیا گیا تھا، جس میں درخواست گزار کا نام بطور خریدار اور قابض درج تھا۔ اسی طرح مخالف پارٹی کے گواہوں نے بھی اس بات کا اقرار کیا۔


4. اپیل کا فیصلہ: عدالت عالیہ نے اپیل کی سماعت کے بعد اپیلیٹ عدالت کے فیصلے کو کالعدم قرار دیا اور سول عدالت کا فیصلہ بحال کیا۔ یوں درخواست گزار کے حق میں حکم امتناعی کو برقرار رکھا گیا۔


5. اہم قانون نکتہ: عدالت نے قرار دیا کہ جائیداد کی تفصیل نہ ہونے کے باوجود بھی جب تک دعوے میں استدلال مضبوط ہے، دائمی حکم امتناعی دیا جا سکتا ہے۔



فیصلہ: درخواست گزار کی اپیل منظور کر لی گئی اور سول عدالت کا حکم بحال کر دیا گیا۔

2024 C L C 381

[High Court (AJ&K)]

Before Mian Arif Hussain, J

JAMROZ KHAN and another----Appellants

Versus

SHUJAT KHAN and others----Respondents

Civil Appeal No.62 of 2018, decided on 7th April, 2023.

Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---

----S. 54---Suit for permanent injunction---Non-description of the suit-property---Scope and effect---Civil Court decreed the suit as prayed for, however, the Appellate Court disagreed with the findings of the Trial Court on the ground that the plaintiffs had failed to establish the description of the suit-property---Question was that as to whether the plaintiffs/appellant had succeeded to prove their stance raised in the plaint or not; and whether due to non-description of the suit-property, no effective decree of perpetual injunction could be granted---Held, that relevant Jamabandi, exhibited by the plaintiffs / appellants, showed that in the column of cultivation, the possession of plaintiffs / appellant and of proforma defendant/ respondent was recorded as purchaser, regarding a piece of land measuring 07 Marlas falling in relevant survey number; said survey number had an independent and separate identity---Such entry was also available in relevant Girdawri register and although the names of a few other persons were also recorded in said column, however, they admittedly appeared as seller/co-sharer in the Khewat but so far as question of possession was concerned, the said document spoke volume that plaintiffs/ appellants and proforma defendant/respondent were sole possessor of said survey numbers as purchasers/vendees and said position was even admitted by one of the defendant/ respondent---Moreover, the witnesses of the parties also corroborated the said version of the plaintiffs / appellants---Defendants/respondents admittedly claimed that they had purchased the suit-property from the disputed khewat, so the question of apprehension of interference in the light of evidence could not be ruled out---Appellate Court fell in error while evaluating the evidence adduced in the present case---High Court set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Court and restored the judgment passed by the Civil Court; consequently the suit filed by the plaintiff/appellant stood decreed---Appeal preferred by the plaintiff was allowed, in circumstances.

            Rafiullah Sultani for Appellants.

 


For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.


  













 



 







































 































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Property ki taqseem ,Warasat main warson ka hisa

-
Image
Inheritance properties distribution  What is the new law of inheritance in Pakistan? As o. Here are some key points regarding inheritance in Pakistan: 1. **Islamic Inheritance Laws:**    - Pakistan follows the principles of Islamic inheritance, as outlined in the Quran. These laws dictate the distribution of an individual's assets among heirs. 2. **Intestate Succession:**    - If a person dies without a will (intestate), the distribution of the estate is guided by Islamic inheritance laws. 3. **Heirs:**    - Common heirs include spouses, children, parents, and other close relatives. The specific shares of each heir are determined by Islamic rules. 4. **Wills:**    - While Islamic inheritance principles are followed in the absence of a will, individuals have the option to draft a will to specify how they want their assets distributed. However, the will must not contradict Islamic inheritance laws. 5. **Legal Assistance:**    - It's...
Read more

Punishment for violation of section 144 crpc | dafa 144 in Pakistan means,kia hai , khalaf warzi per kitni punishment hu gi،kab or kese lagai ja ja sakti hai.

-
Image
How to enforce  section 144 "Dafa 144" is a term used in Pakistan to refer to Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code. When authorities impose Dafa 144, it means that they are prohibiting the assembly of a certain number of people in a specific area to maintain public order and prevent disturbances. Dafa 144 meaning in Urdu "Dafa 144" ایک اصطلاح ہے جو پاکستان میں ضابطہ فوجداری کی دفعہ 144 کے لیے استعمال ہوتی ہے۔ جب حکام دفا 144 نافذ کرتے ہیں، تو اس کا مطلب یہ ہوتا ہے کہ وہ امن عامہ کو برقرار رکھنے اور خلل کو روکنے کے لیے مخصوص علاقے میں لوگوں کی ایک خاص تعداد کے جمع ہونے پر پابندی لگا رہے ہیں۔  144 or section 144 Aksar dekha gia hai ke dafa. 144 ka nafaz kia jata hai magar humare logo ke zahan ma swalat uthte hain ke ye section kia hai , kab or kio lagai jati hai. Saza kia hu gi .agar koi banda section 144 ki khalaf warzi karta hai. Section 144 ki khalaf warzi per 6 month qaid or jurmana ki saza hu sakti ha. Under section 188 ppc 144 section or 188 section parhai...
Read more

Bachon ki custody of minors after divorce or separation

-
Image
Custody procedure of kids through court  PLD 2023 Lahore 433 Constitutional petition against an order passed under S. 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act , 1890 , for the grant of interim custody is maintainable because the remedy of appeal against such an order is not available , as per S. 14 ( 3 ) of the Family Courts Act. Interim custody of minor --- Scope --- Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act , 1890 , enacts the power to make interlocutory order for production of minor and interim protection of person and property .  Childern Custody after divorce or separation through Guardian court                                     videos main detail batai gai hai . Aisa iqrarnama jiss main walda apne khazanat ke haq main dastbardari show kar rahi hu bilkul ghair qanooni hai.(PLD 2024 supreme Court 291) Ajj hum Baat karain ge bachon ki custody ko le ke jo ke aik buhat nazak mas...
Read more