Bail 302/392 | Murder during robbery "The Supreme Court held that the accused accused of murder and robbery proved by CCTV footage, victim's statement, forensic evidence and recovery of blood-stained knife, is guilty of a serious crime, hence he is not entitled to bail. No. 2024 S C M R 1419

Murder during robbery
"The Supreme Court held that the accused accused of murder and robbery proved by CCTV footage, victim's statement, forensic evidence and recovery of blood-stained knife, is guilty of a serious crime, hence he is not entitled to bail. No.
2024 S C M R 1419

یہ مقدمہ سپریم کورٹ آف پاکستان کے سامنے پیش کیا گیا تھا، جس میں ملزم (کامرآن) نے ضمانت کے لیے درخواست دی تھی۔ عدالت نے اس درخواست کو مسترد کر دیا اور ضمانت دینے سے انکار کر دیا۔

کیس کے اہم نکات:

1. الزام: ایف آئی آر کے مطابق، ملزم نے مقتول کے پیٹ پر چھری کے وار کیے، جس سے وہ شدید زخمی ہوا اور اگلے دن زخموں کی تاب نہ لاتے ہوئے انتقال کر گیا۔

2. ثبوت:

مقتول کا ضمنی بیان، جو ہسپتال میں پولیس کے سامنے وقوعہ کے دن ریکارڈ کیا گیا، اس میں ملزم کو جرم کا مرتکب قرار دیا گیا۔

مقتول کے والد اور ایک گواہ نے سی سی ٹی وی ویڈیو دیکھنے کے بعد اپنے بیانات میں ملزم کو شناخت کیا۔

پنجاب فرانزک سائنس ایجنسی کی ویڈیو تجزیے کی رپورٹ میں سی سی ٹی وی فوٹیج کو غیر ترمیم شدہ قرار دیا گیا۔

پوسٹ مارٹم رپورٹ کے مطابق، مقتول کی موت پیٹ کی اندرونی چوٹوں کی وجہ سے ہوئی۔

برآمد شدہ چھری کو انسانی خون سے آلودہ پایا گیا۔

3. قانونی نکتہ:

جرم (سیکشن 392، تعزیرات پاکستان) ایک سنگین نوعیت کا تھا، جس کی سزا موت یا عمر قید ہو سکتی ہے۔

سیکشن 497، ضابطہ فوجداری کی ممانعتی شق کے تحت ملزم کو ضمانت کا حق نہیں دیا جا سکتا تھا۔

عدالت نے یہ بھی قرار دیا کہ ملزم کا کم عمر ہونا (juvenile) ضمانت کی رعایت کے لیے کافی نہیں کیونکہ جرم انتہائی سنگین نوعیت کا تھا۔

فیصلہ:

عدالت نے قرار دیا کہ مقدمے کے حقائق اور شواہد کی روشنی میں ملزم کے خلاف مضبوط کیس موجود ہے۔ ضمانت کی درخواست مسترد کر دی گئی اور اپیل کی اجازت بھی نہیں دی گئی۔

2024 S C M R 1419

[Supreme Court of Pakistan]

Present: Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Musarrat Hillani and Naeem Akhtar Afghan, JJ

KAMRAN---Petitioner

Versus

The STATE through A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others---Respondents

Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 199 of 2024, decided on 19th April, 2024.

(Against the order dated 19.02.2024 passed by the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 286-P of 2024).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 392---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)---Robbery---Bail, refusal of---In the FIR, allegation against the petitioner was that he inflicted chhuri/ dagger blows at the abdomen of the deceased/complainant, which proved fatal and the complainant succumbed to injuries on the following day---Through a supplementary statement of the deceased/ complainant, which was recorded by the police on the day of occurrence while the complainant was admitted in the hospital, he nominated the present petitioner to be the unknown culprit who committed the offence---Father of the deceased/ complainant and a prosecution witness after having seen the CCTV video of the occurrence showing petitioner stabbing the deceased/complainant, charged the petitioner for murder of the deceased in their statements recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C.---In the forensic video analysis made by the Punjab Forensic Science Agency of the CCTV video of the occurrence, no editing features were observed, hence the question of false implication did not arise in the instant matter---Cause of death, as recorded in the post-mortem report, was injuries to liver and major vessel of the abdomen---Recovered chhuri/ dagger, as per FSL report, was found to be stained with the human blood---In this way, the medical evidence and the recovery of crime weapon fully supported the prosecution case by connecting the petitioner with the commission of crime, which entailed capital punishment and fell within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C.---Mere fact that the petitioner was a juvenile did not entitle him to the concession of bail as he was charged for a heinous offence, the punishment for which was death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for more than seven years---Petitioner was not entitled to the concession of bail---Bail application was, therefore, dismissed and leave was declined.

Zia-ur-Rahman Tajik, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for the Complainant.

Nemo for the State.

For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.