Order 37 suit, the defendant accepted the Pronote and did not object to the arbitrators' decision and did not pay. The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the lower courts and ordered the payment. 2024 S C M R 1208

-





خضر حیات اور ملک اختر محمود کے درمیان ایک کاروباری معاملے میں اختلاف پیدا ہوا، جس کے نتیجے میں خضر حیات نے ملک اختر کو 60 لاکھ روپے کی ادائیگی کے وعدے پر ایک پرونوٹ جاری کیا۔ دونوں نے مسئلے کے حل کے لیے ثالثوں کا تقرر کیا، اور خضر حیات نے اس بات پر اتفاق کیا کہ اگر ثالث ان کے خلاف فیصلہ دیں گے، تو وہ اسے قبول کریں گے۔

ثالثوں نے معاملے کا جائزہ لیا اور خضر حیات کو 60 لاکھ روپے کی رقم ملک اختر محمود کو ادا کرنے کا حکم دیا۔ اس فیصلے کے بعد پرونوٹ اور چیک ملک اختر کو واپس کر دیے گئے، جنہیں خضر حیات نے رضامندی سے جاری کیا تھا۔

وقت گزرتا گیا لیکن خضر حیات نے اس فیصلے کو چیلنج نہیں کیا اور نہ ہی ادائیگی کی۔ ملک اختر نے پھر عدالت میں مقدمہ دائر کیا تاکہ پرونوٹ کی بنیاد پر رقم کی وصولی کی جا سکے۔ عدالت میں، خضر حیات نے اپنی گواہی میں تسلیم کیا کہ انہوں نے خود پرونوٹ اور چیک جاری کیے تھے اور وہ رقم ادا کرنے کے پابند تھے۔

عدالت نے یہ دیکھتے ہوئے کہ خضر حیات نے ثالثی کے فیصلے کو کبھی چیلنج نہیں کیا اور اپنی گواہی میں بھی ادائیگی کی ذمہ داری قبول کی تھی، ملک اختر کے حق میں فیصلہ دیا۔ خضر حیات کی درخواست مسترد کر دی گئی اور ملک اختر کو 60 لاکھ روپے کی رقم کی وصولی کا حکم دیا گیا۔
2024 S C M R 1208
In the Order 37 suit, the defendant accepted the Pronote and did not object to the arbitrators' decision and did not pay. The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the lower courts and ordered the payment.
2024 S C M R 1

[Supreme Court of Pakistan]

Present: Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Musarrat Hilali and Naeem Akhtar Afghan, JJ

KHIZAR HAYAT---Petitioner

Versus

Malik AKHTAR MEHMOOD---Respondent

Civil Petition No.760 of 2024, decided on 15th April, 2024.

            (Against judgment dated 18.01.2024 passed by the Lahore High Court in R.F.A. No. 66727 of 2020).

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---

----O.XXXVII, R. 2---Suit for recovery on the basis of a pro-note---Record revealed that execution of pro-note was admitted by the petitioner (defendant)---In the agreement between the parties, the petitioner unequivocally confirmed the execution of the pro-note and also undertook that if arbitrators decided the matter against him, he would have no objection---This clearly indicated that pro-note was executed against due consideration by the petitioner voluntarily---It appears that cheque along with the pro-note was given to arbitrators for redetermination and reconsideration of amount due and once the Arbitrators confirmed the amount of Rs. 6,000,000/- as due to the respondent (plaintiff) from the petitioner, the pro-note was handed over back the respondent along with a cheque executed by the petitioner---Petitioner had neither challenged the decision of the arbitrators nor the agreement for appointment of arbitrators or execution of cheque and pro-note---Moreover, perusal of the testimony of the petitioner in his examination in chief clearly indicated that he himself admitted the liability to pay and voluntarily issued the pro-note and cheque---Suit for recovery was rightly decreed in favour of the respondent---Petition was dismissed and leave was refused.

       Malik Matee Ullah, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.

       N.R. for Respondent

 

For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.














 



 







































 































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Property ki taqseem ,Warasat main warson ka hisa

-
Image
Inheritance properties distribution  What is the new law of inheritance in Pakistan? As o. Here are some key points regarding inheritance in Pakistan: 1. **Islamic Inheritance Laws:**    - Pakistan follows the principles of Islamic inheritance, as outlined in the Quran. These laws dictate the distribution of an individual's assets among heirs. 2. **Intestate Succession:**    - If a person dies without a will (intestate), the distribution of the estate is guided by Islamic inheritance laws. 3. **Heirs:**    - Common heirs include spouses, children, parents, and other close relatives. The specific shares of each heir are determined by Islamic rules. 4. **Wills:**    - While Islamic inheritance principles are followed in the absence of a will, individuals have the option to draft a will to specify how they want their assets distributed. However, the will must not contradict Islamic inheritance laws. 5. **Legal Assistance:**    - It's...
Read more

Punishment for violation of section 144 crpc | dafa 144 in Pakistan means,kia hai , khalaf warzi per kitni punishment hu gi،kab or kese lagai ja ja sakti hai.

-
Image
How to enforce  section 144 "Dafa 144" is a term used in Pakistan to refer to Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code. When authorities impose Dafa 144, it means that they are prohibiting the assembly of a certain number of people in a specific area to maintain public order and prevent disturbances. Dafa 144 meaning in Urdu "Dafa 144" ایک اصطلاح ہے جو پاکستان میں ضابطہ فوجداری کی دفعہ 144 کے لیے استعمال ہوتی ہے۔ جب حکام دفا 144 نافذ کرتے ہیں، تو اس کا مطلب یہ ہوتا ہے کہ وہ امن عامہ کو برقرار رکھنے اور خلل کو روکنے کے لیے مخصوص علاقے میں لوگوں کی ایک خاص تعداد کے جمع ہونے پر پابندی لگا رہے ہیں۔  144 or section 144 Aksar dekha gia hai ke dafa. 144 ka nafaz kia jata hai magar humare logo ke zahan ma swalat uthte hain ke ye section kia hai , kab or kio lagai jati hai. Saza kia hu gi .agar koi banda section 144 ki khalaf warzi karta hai. Section 144 ki khalaf warzi per 6 month qaid or jurmana ki saza hu sakti ha. Under section 188 ppc 144 section or 188 section parhai...
Read more

Bachon ki custody of minors after divorce or separation

-
Image
Custody procedure of kids through court  PLD 2023 Lahore 433 Constitutional petition against an order passed under S. 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act , 1890 , for the grant of interim custody is maintainable because the remedy of appeal against such an order is not available , as per S. 14 ( 3 ) of the Family Courts Act. Interim custody of minor --- Scope --- Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act , 1890 , enacts the power to make interlocutory order for production of minor and interim protection of person and property .  Childern Custody after divorce or separation through Guardian court                                     videos main detail batai gai hai . Aisa iqrarnama jiss main walda apne khazanat ke haq main dastbardari show kar rahi hu bilkul ghair qanooni hai.(PLD 2024 supreme Court 291) Ajj hum Baat karain ge bachon ki custody ko le ke jo ke aik buhat nazak mas...
Read more