Case law on application of condonation of delay .


Condonation of delay application 



In this case, the plaintiff's case was dismissed by the Civil Court. Instead of appealing to the High Court, the plaintiff appealed to the District Court, which took about a year and was eventually returned. The plaintiff then tried to exclude this time period from the appeal to the High Court. The court held that following legal timelines isn't just a technicality; it's essential. The Limitation Act doesn't excuse carelessness. The plaintiff's request to exclude the time spent in the wrong forum was dismissed. The case details are from R.F.A. No.51 of 2023, Ayaz Mehmood vs. Musadaq Riaz and 2 others, 2024 CLC 357.


Application for enlargement of time by excluding the time period of pursuing the case before wrong forum / Court --- Condonation of delay --- " Sufficient cause " --- Suit instituted by the plaintiff ( appellant ) was dismissed by the Civil Court , however , Instead of filing appeal before the High Court , he filed appeal before the District Court which remained pending for about one year and finally the appeal was returned under O.VII , R.10 of the C.P.C .--- Appellant / plaintiff while preferring appeal before the High / Appellate Court also moved an application for excluding the period of pursing the remedy before the District Court --- Contention of the applicant / appellant that the cases should be decided on the basis of merits rather than technicalities --- Held , that the contention of the applicant / appellant was misconceived as availing the remedy within the period provided by law was not merely a technicality --- Section 5 or S.14 of the Limitation Act , 1908 , was not intended to add premium to the carelessness or to validate lack of vigilance and required caution by a litigant --- Application for enlargement of time by excluding the time period of about one year for pursuing remedy before wrong forum , filed by the appellant , had no substance , therefosre , the same was dismissed.
R.F.A. No.51 of 2023
AYAZ MEHMOOD versus MUSADAQ RIAZ and 2 others 
2024 C LC 357

For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Property ki taqseem ,Warasat main warson ka hisa

Bachon Ka Kharcha Lena After separation | bachon ka kharcha after divorce | How much child maintenance should a father pay in Pakistan? Case laws about maintenance case.

Bachon ki custody of minors after divorce or separation