In the cases under CNSA 1997 it is the duty of the prosecution to establish each and every step from the stage of recovery, making of sample parcels, safe custody of sample parcels and safe transmission of the sample parcels to the concerned laboratory. This chain has to be established by the prosecution and if any link is missing, the benefit of the same has to be extended to the accused
In the cases under CNSA 1997 it is the duty of the prosecution to establish each and every step from the stage of recovery, making of sample parcels, safe custody of sample parcels and safe transmission of the sample parcels to the concerned laboratory. This chain has to be established by the prosecution and if any link is missing, the benefit of the same has to be extended to the accused.
In the cases under CNSA 1997, the prosecution is under a bounded responsibility to drive home the charge against an accused by proving each limb of its case that essentially includes production of the witness tasked with the responsibility of transmitting the samples to the office of Chemical Examiner and the failure is devastatingly appalling with unredeemable consequences that cast away the entire case.
Under rule 4(2) of the Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules 2001 (‘Rules of 2001’), the sample for analysis has to be dispatched to the testing laboratory at the earliest but not later than seventy two hours of the seizure.
Rule 22.70 of the Police Rules, 1934 (‘the Police Rules’) mandates that Register No.XIX shall be maintained in Form 22.70 of the Police Rules in the police station wherein, with the exception of articles already included in Register No.XVI, every article placed in the store room (Malkhana) shall be entered and the removal of any such article shall also be noted in the appropriate column.
Crl.P.L.A.1602/2023
Asif Ali S/o Zafar Ali & another v. The State P.G. Punjab
Mr. Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan
22-05-2024
2024 SCP 192
Comments
Post a Comment