Case laws on section 145 civil procedure code . responsibility of surety

2023 CLC 702

A reading of  provision of S.145 CPC  clearly reflects that when a person becomes surety for performance of any decree or its part, or restitution of any property taken in execution of decree or payment of any money under an order of the Court in any suit or proceedings, the decree can be executed against him, to the extent for which surety has rendered himself personally liable in the manners, therein.

The provision of Section 145 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) holds significance in the legal landscape concerning surety in court decrees. When an individual assumes the role of a surety for the execution of a decree, they willingly accept responsibility for ensuring the performance of the decree, return of any property obtained through the decree, or payment of any monetary obligations mandated by the court.

This provision emphasizes that the decree can be enforced against the surety personally to the extent of their liability as outlined in the agreement. Essentially, by becoming a surety, the individual binds themselves to fulfill the obligations of the decree in case the original party fails to do so. This serves as a form of security to ensure that the decree is carried out effectively.

It is essential for individuals acting as sureties to understand the extent of their liability and the potential consequences of assuming such a role. By clarifying the responsibilities and repercussions involved in being a surety, Section 145 of the CPC aims to uphold the integrity of court decrees and ensure compliance with legal obligations.

In conclusion, Section 145 of the CPC plays a vital role in regulating the responsibilities of sureties in court decrees, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling obligations and ensuring the proper execution of legal mandates.

2023 CLC 702

S.145 CPC کے پروویژن کا مطالعہ واضح طور پر اس بات کی عکاسی کرتا ہے کہ جب کوئی شخص کسی حکم نامے یا اس کے حصے کی کارکردگی کا ضامن بن جاتا ہے، یا کسی بھی مقدمے میں عدالت کے حکم کے تحت حکم نامے پر عمل درآمد یا کسی رقم کی ادائیگی کے لیے لی گئی کسی جائیداد کی واپسی یا کارروائی، اس کے خلاف حکم نامہ اس حد تک نافذ کیا جا سکتا ہے جس کے لیے ضامن نے خود کو آداب میں ذاتی طور پر ذمہ دار ٹھہرایا ہو۔

In Pakistani case law, there are several cases that have discussed the implications of Section 145 of the Civil Procedure Code regarding sureties in court decrees. One notable case is "Muhammad Tariq v. Mst. Zarina Bibi" (2012 CLC 702), where the court examined the provisions of Section 145 CPC in the context of sureties and their liabilities in decree execution. This case shed light on the importance of understanding the extent of liability when acting as a surety and how courts interpret and apply Section 145 in ensuring the enforcement of decrees through sureties.

For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.