child maintenance The High Court held that the petitioner could have proved his status in the trial court by giving a statement of salary account, showing his assets or by getting the testimony of the employer. Which he did not do. Writ dismissed. 2024 C L C 1580

Writ for reduction of child support
The High Court held that the petitioner could have proved his status in the trial court by giving a statement of salary account, showing his assets or by getting the testimony of the employer. Which he did not do. Writ dismissed.
2024 C L C 1580

درخواست گزار، سید زین منتظر مدعی نے اپنی بیوی، مِسْٹ سارہ نقوی اور بچوں کے نفقے کے حوالے سے عدالت میں درخواست دائر کی۔ درخواست میں اس بات کا تنازعہ تھا کہ وہ اپنی بیوی اور بچوں کے نفقے کے لئے مطلوبہ رقم ادا کرنے کے قابل نہیں ہے۔

عدالت نے شوہر کی قانونی، اخلاقی اور شرعی ذمہ داری کو مدنظر رکھتے ہوئے فیصلہ کیا کہ شوہر پر بیوی کا نفقہ ادا کرنا لازمی ہے، جیسا کہ اسلامی قانون میں بھی ذکر ہے۔ مزید برآں، عدالت نے والد کی مالی حیثیت کو ثابت کرنے کے لئے اسے معتبر ثبوت فراہم کرنے کا حکم دیا، جس میں بینک اسٹیٹمنٹ یا ملازمت کے سرکاری ریکارڈ شامل ہو سکتے تھے۔ چونکہ درخواست گزار نے اپنی تنخواہ کی پرچی کو ثابت کرنے کے لئے کسی معتبر ثبوت کو پیش نہیں کیا، عدالت نے اس کو مسترد کرتے ہوئے نچلی عدالتوں کے فیصلے کو برقرار رکھا اور درخواست گزار کی آئینی درخواست خارج کر دی۔

یہ کیس اس بات کو ظاہر کرتا ہے کہ نفقے کے تعین میں شوہر/والد کی مالی حیثیت کو ثابت کرنے کے لئے درست اور تصدیق شدہ دستاویزات کی ضرورت ہوتی ہے۔

یہ کیس "Syed Zain Muntazar Mehdi بمقابلہ Mst. Sara Naqvi اور دیگران" لاہور ہائی کورٹ کے راولپنڈی بینچ میں جسٹس جواد حسن کے سامنے پیش ہوا۔ اس کیس میں بنیادی طور پر نکاح شدہ بیوی اور بچوں کے نفقے کے معاملات زیر بحث آئے۔ کیس کا خلاصہ درج ذیل ہے:

(الف) شوہر/والد کے نفقے کی ذمہ داری

شوہر پر قانونی، اخلاقی اور شرعی طور پر بیوی کا نفقہ ادا کرنا لازم ہے۔

محمدن لاء کی دفعہ 272 اور 278 کے تحت شوہر پر بیوی کا نفقہ فراہم کرنا فرض ہے۔ اگر وہ نفقہ دینے سے انکار کرے تو بیوی عدالت سے رجوع کر سکتی ہے۔

نفقہ میں کھانا، لباس، اور رہائش شامل ہیں، جیسا کہ "ہدایہ" کے اصولوں کے تحت بیان کیا گیا ہے۔

اس کیس میں نچلی عدالتوں نے شوہر کو بیوی کا نفقہ ادا کرنے کا پابند قرار دیا، جو قانون اور شریعت کے مطابق تھا۔

(ب) بچوں کے نفقے کا تعین

والد پر بچوں کی تعلیم، رہائش، اور دیگر ضروریات کے لئے نفقہ فراہم کرنا لازم ہے۔

عدالت بچوں کے نفقے کی مقدار کا تعین کرتے ہوئے ان کی تعلیم، حیثیت، اور عمومی اخراجات کو مدنظر رکھتی ہے۔

والد کی مالی حیثیت، بچوں کے اخراجات، اور دیگر عوامل کو دیکھتے ہوئے ایک مناسب معیار طے کیا جاتا ہے تاکہ بچوں کی کفالت عزت اور آرام کے ساتھ ہو۔

(ج) والد کی مالی حیثیت کا ثبوت

والد پر لازم ہے کہ وہ اپنی آمدنی کے معتبر ثبوت فراہم کرے۔

اس کیس میں درخواست گزار نے اپنی تنخواہ کی پرچی اور اکاؤنٹ کھولنے کا فارم پیش کیا لیکن یہ دونوں دستاویزات عدالت کے معیار پر پورا نہ اتر سکیں۔

درخواست گزار نے اپنے بینک اسٹیٹمنٹ یا کسی متعلقہ گواہ کو پیش نہیں کیا، جو اس کی مالی حیثیت کو ثابت کر سکے۔

لہٰذا عدالت نے مدعا علیہ (ماں) کی طرف سے فراہم کردہ ضروریات کو بنیاد بنا کر نفقہ کا تعین کیا۔

فیصلہ

درخواست گزار کی آئینی درخواست کو غیر معقول قرار دے کر خارج کر دیا گیا کیونکہ نچلی عدالتوں کے فیصلے میں کوئی قانونی خامی موجود نہیں تھی۔

یہ کیس ایک واضح مثال ہے کہ نفقے کی ادائیگی میں شوہر/والد کی ذمہ داری کو قانون اور شریعت دونوں کے تحت کیسے نافذ کیا جا سکتا ہے۔

2024 C L C 1580

[Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)]

Before Jawad Hassan, J

Syed ZAIN MUNTAZAR MEHDI----Petitioner

Versus

Mst. SARA NAQVI and others----Respondents

Writ Petition No.370 of 2024, heard on 21st March, 2024.

(a) Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)---

----S.5, Sched.----Maintenance allowance to wife and children, providing of---Obligation of husband/father---Scope---Husband is under legal, moral and religious obligation to maintain his legally wedded wife---Section 272 of Mohammdan Law provides obligation of a husband to maintain his wife with certain conditions---Section 278 of Mohammdan Law postulates that if a husband refuses to maintain his wife, she may sue for maintenance---Hence, it is the obligation of husband to pay Nafqa or maintenance, if construed in accordance with the principles as laid down in "HIDAYA" translated by Charles Hamilton in Chapter XV such as "Nafqa", in the language of law, signifies all those things which are necessary to support life, such as food, clothes and lodging---In the present case, the Courts below had held the petitioner (husband) under obligation to pay maintenance allowance of the respondent/wife, which by no means was in deviation to law and Sharia---Likewise, a father is under legal, moral and religious obligation to maintain his children till the age specified by law/sharia and such obligation originates from esteemed dictates of Holy Quran---Father's obligation to maintain his children has repeatedly been recognized and emphasized.

Humayun Hassan v. Arslan Humayun and another PLD 2013 SC 557 and Syeda Farhat Jahan v. Syed Iqbal Hussain Rizvi and another 2010 YLR 3275 ref.

(b) Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)---

----S.5, Sched.---Suit for recovery of maintenance allowance---Maintenance allowance of the minors, quantum of---Scope---Father is obligated to maintain his children and a reasonable standard must be assumed for determining quantum of their maintenance allowance---Court while considering the quantum of maintenance will take into consideration the fundamentals of the minors education, status, general expenses---Court must also take into consideration reasonable probability of obtaining education and the ability to take care of the minors in a stable, safe and healthy environment---Without due consideration of all said factors, the Court cannot conclude positively the quantum of maintenance---There is no hard and fast formula for determining quantum of maintenance and the main consideration for the Court is the ability of the father to maintain the minors---Thus, merely stating that he is short of resources will not discharge him of his obligation---Basic objective for determining maintenance is to ensure that in all probability the minors are maintained by the father in a dignified manner with reasonable comfort and that the mother of the child is not left to bear the burden of taking care of the minors---Quantum of maintenance requires due consideration of all factors on the basis of which the court can determine the actual need of the minor---In said regard, it is important for the court to keep in consideration the expenses incurred or likely to be incurred on the minors---For the purpose of maintenance it is the obligation of the father to fulfill needs of his kids.

Nazia Bibi and others v. Additional District Judge, Ferozewala and others PLD 2018 Lah. 916 ref.

(c) Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)---

----S.5, Sched.---Suit for recovery of maintenance allowance---Maintenance allowance of the minors---Financial status of the father---Proof---Notwithstanding the fact that the respondent (plaintiff/mother) was unable to procure and bring on record salary slip of the petitioner, he himself was obliged to bring on record reliable and trustworthy record/documents disclosing his monthly salary---Petitioner though had produced (got exhibited) in evidence his alleged salary slip, but said salary slip by no means qualified standards to attain trustworthy status for reliance on certain counts; one that it did not conform with minimum standards of wages, and second that it was a document handed out and produced by the petitioner himself, which from the face of it appeared to be a computer generated copy lacking any sort of verification on behalf of the petitioner's employer---To prove said document (salary slip), the petitioner could have easily adduced his bank statement of the salary account, transpiring exact deposits from his company on account of his salary; he could have also produced his employer or any other authorized official of the company in support of sanctity, truthfulness and genuine status of said document (salary slip)---Petitioner's employer or his authorized official, whilst appearing in witness box, could have brought on record bank and tax record to establish and prove remittances in the petitioner's salary account on head of his salary---However, the petitioner did not do the same and only produced said two documents (salary slip and salary account opening form) for proving his salary, which attempt fells short on account of no evidentiary value attached to both said documents---Though the provisions of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 are not stricto sensu applicable to family matters, but exhibited salary slip was bereft of any strength and evidentiary value---If salary slip had been an official/attested/verified document, then situation would have been different, but genuine origination and sanctity of exhibited salary slip was not of required standards for being relied upon---In the circumstances, the Courts below had no option but to believe the evidence produced by the respondent (plaintiff / mother) regarding immediate necessities of claimants of maintenance allowance and fixing up same keeping in light the petitioner's obligations as well---No ground whatsoever was available to substitute the concurrent findings of courts below---Constitutional petition, being meritless, is dismissed, in circumstances.

Muhammad Asim and others v. Mst. Samro Begum and others PLD 2018 SC 819 ref.

Malik Aamir Saleem for Petitioner.

Ms. Farzana Aziz for Respondent No.1.

For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us. Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people of their rights and how can get their rights. we will answer every question, so we need your help to achieve our goal. plz tell people about this blog and subscribe to our youtube channel and follow us at the end of this post.