What is the Federal Shariat court | how can challenge an law.
 |
| Federal shariat court |
**The Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan: Upholding Islamic Law**
The Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan stands as a pivotal institution in the country's legal framework, tasked with interpreting laws in accordance with Islamic principles. Established through the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan in 1980, its inception aimed to ensure the conformity of Pakistani laws with the teachings of Islam. This article delves into the structure, functions, and significance of the Federal Shariat Court in Pakistan's legal landscape.
**Structure and Composition:**
The Federal Shariat Court comprises Islamic scholars and jurists with expertise in Islamic law. According to the Constitution, the Court consists of eight Muslim judges, including a Chief Justice who must be a senior judge of the Supreme Court or a former Chief Justice of Pakistan. The President of Pakistan appoints these judges in consultation with the Chief Justice of Pakistan and the Governor of the Province concerned.
**Jurisdiction and Functions:**
The primary function of the Federal Shariat Court is to examine and determine whether any law or provision of law is repugnant to the injunctions of Islam. It has the authority to strike down laws that it deems inconsistent with Islamic principles. However, the Court's jurisdiction is not unlimited; it can only review laws referred to it by the President or a Governor if they raise questions concerning the conformity of such laws with Islam.
Additionally, the Court has the power to advise the Majlis-e-Shura (Federal Parliament) on whether a proposed legislation complies with Islamic injunctions before its enactment. This advisory role underscores the Court's influence in shaping legislation and ensuring its alignment with Islamic teachings.
**Significance and Impact:**
The establishment of the Federal Shariat Court reflects Pakistan's commitment to incorporating Islamic principles into its legal system. By providing a mechanism for the review of laws through an Islamic lens, the Court contributes to the development of a legal framework that resonates with the country's religious and cultural ethos.
However, the Court's decisions and interpretations have sometimes sparked debates and controversies, especially concerning the balance between Islamic law and modern legal norms. Critics argue that the Court's decisions have occasionally led to the imposition of strict interpretations of Islamic law, potentially infringing on individual rights and freedoms.
Nevertheless, the Federal Shariat Court remains an integral institution in Pakistan's legal system, bridging the gap between the country's legal framework and Islamic jurisprudence. Its role in upholding Islamic principles within the legal framework underscores its significance in shaping the trajectory of Pakistan's legal landscape.
In conclusion, the Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan stands as a testament to the country's commitment to integrating Islamic principles into its legal system. While its decisions may spark debate, the Court's role in interpreting laws through an Islamic lens remains crucial in shaping Pakistan's legal landscape and ensuring the compatibility of its laws with the tenets of Islam.
**پاکستان کی وفاقی شرعی عدالت: اسلامی قانون کی پاسداری**
پاکستان کی وفاقی شرعی عدالت ملک کے قانونی فریم ورک میں ایک اہم ادارے کے طور پر کھڑی ہے، جسے اسلامی اصولوں کے مطابق قوانین کی تشریح کا کام سونپا گیا ہے۔ 1980 میں پاکستان کے آئین میں آٹھویں ترمیم کے ذریعے قائم کیا گیا، اس کے قیام کا مقصد پاکستانی قوانین کو اسلام کی تعلیمات سے ہم آہنگ کرنا تھا۔ یہ مضمون پاکستان کے قانونی منظر نامے میں وفاقی شرعی عدالت کی ساخت، افعال اور اہمیت پر روشنی ڈالتا ہے۔
** ساخت اور ترکیب:**
وفاقی شرعی عدالت اسلامی اسکالرز اور فقہا پر مشتمل ہے جو اسلامی قانون میں مہارت رکھتے ہیں۔ آئین کے مطابق، عدالت آٹھ مسلم ججوں پر مشتمل ہے، جس میں ایک چیف جسٹس بھی شامل ہے جس کے لیے سپریم کورٹ کا سینئر جج یا سابق چیف جسٹس آف پاکستان ہونا ضروری ہے۔ صدر پاکستان ان ججوں کی تقرری چیف جسٹس آف پاکستان اور متعلقہ صوبے کے گورنر کی مشاورت سے کرتے ہیں۔
** دائرہ اختیار اور افعال:**
وفاقی شرعی عدالت کا بنیادی کام اس بات کا جائزہ لینا اور اس بات کا تعین کرنا ہے کہ آیا کوئی قانون یا قانون کی دفعات اسلام کے احکام کے خلاف ہے یا نہیں۔ اس کے پاس ایسے قوانین کو ختم کرنے کا اختیار ہے جنہیں وہ اسلامی اصولوں سے متصادم سمجھے۔ تاہم، عدالت کا دائرہ اختیار لامحدود نہیں ہے۔ یہ صرف صدر یا گورنر کے ذریعہ حوالہ کردہ قوانین کا جائزہ لے سکتا ہے اگر وہ اس طرح کے قوانین کے اسلام کے ساتھ مطابقت کے بارے میں سوالات اٹھاتے ہیں۔
مزید برآں، عدالت کو یہ اختیار حاصل ہے کہ وہ مجلس شوریٰ (وفاقی پارلیمنٹ) کو مشورہ دے کہ آیا کوئی مجوزہ قانون نافذ ہونے سے پہلے اسلامی احکام کی تعمیل کرتا ہے۔ یہ مشاورتی کردار قانون سازی کی تشکیل اور اسلامی تعلیمات کے ساتھ اس کی ہم آہنگی کو یقینی بنانے میں عدالت کے اثر و رسوخ کی نشاندہی کرتا ہے۔
**اہمیت اور اثر:**
وفاقی شرعی عدالت کا قیام پاکستان کے اسلامی اصولوں کو اپنے قانونی نظام میں شامل کرنے کے عزم کی عکاسی کرتا ہے۔ اسلامی عینک کے ذریعے قوانین پر نظرثانی کے لیے ایک طریقہ کار فراہم کر کے، عدالت ایک قانونی فریم ورک کی ترقی میں اپنا حصہ ڈالتی ہے جو ملک کے مذہبی اور ثقافتی اقدار سے مطابقت رکھتا ہو۔
تاہم، عدالت کے فیصلوں اور تشریحات نے بعض اوقات بحثوں اور تنازعات کو جنم دیا ہے، خاص طور پر اسلامی قانون اور جدید قانونی اصولوں کے درمیان توازن سے متعلق۔ ناقدین کا استدلال ہے کہ عدالت کے فیصلے کبھی کبھار اسلامی قانون کی سخت تشریحات کے نفاذ کا باعث بنتے ہیں، ممکنہ طور پر انفرادی حقوق اور آزادیوں کی خلاف ورزی ہوتی ہے۔
اس کے باوجود، وفاقی شریعت عدالت پاکستان کے قانونی نظام میں ایک اٹوٹ ادارہ ہے، جو ملک کے قانونی فریم ورک اور اسلامی فقہ کے درمیان فرق کو ختم کرتا ہے۔ قانونی فریم ورک کے اندر اسلامی اصولوں کو برقرار رکھنے میں اس کا کردار پاکستان کے قانونی منظر نامے کی رفتار کو تشکیل دینے میں اس کی اہمیت کو واضح کرتا ہے۔
آخر میں، پاکستان کی وفاقی شرعی عدالت اسلامی اصولوں کو اپنے قانونی نظام میں ضم کرنے کے ملک کے عزم کے ثبوت کے طور پر کھڑی ہے۔ اگرچہ اس کے فیصلے بحث کو جنم دے سکتے ہیں، لیکن اسلامی عدسے سے قوانین کی تشریح کرنے میں عدالت کا کردار پاکستان کے قانونی منظر نامے کی تشکیل اور اس کے قوانین کی اسلام کے اصولوں کے ساتھ مطابقت کو یقینی بنانے میں اہم ہے۔
Case laws on federal shariat court Pakistan
The Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan is tasked with ensuring that the laws of Pakistan comply with Islamic principles as laid down in the Quran and Sunnah. Here are some important case laws related to the Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:
1. **Muhammad Ismail Qureshi vs. Federal Government of Pakistan (PLD 1980 FSC 32):** This case is one of the earliest significant judgments of the Federal Shariat Court. The court declared the interest-based banking system in Pakistan as un-Islamic and ordered the government to implement an interest-free banking system in accordance with Islamic principles.
2. **Ziauddin vs. Ghulam Haider (PLD 1981 FSC 36):** In this case, the Federal Shariat Court held that the provisions of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961, which allowed a Muslim man to divorce his wife by pronouncing talaq (divorce) thrice in a single sitting, were repugnant to Islamic teachings. The court recommended amendments to the law to bring it in line with Islamic principles.
3. **Ms. Farah Naz vs. Government of Pakistan (PLD 1989 FSC 14):** This case addressed the issue of polygamy in Pakistan. The Federal Shariat Court held that the provisions of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961, which allowed Muslim men to marry multiple wives without fulfilling the conditions of justice and equity, were inconsistent with Islamic teachings. The court recommended amendments to the law to ensure compliance with Islamic principles.
4. **Ms. Saima Waheed vs. Government of Punjab (PLD 2005 FSC 6):** In this case, the Federal Shariat Court dealt with the issue of inheritance rights of women under Islamic law. The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that women receive their rightful share of inheritance as prescribed by Islamic teachings and recommended amendments to the law to address any disparities.
5. **Federation of Pakistan vs. Abdul Waheed (PLD 2011 FSC 127):** This case addressed the issue of blasphemy laws in Pakistan. The Federal Shariat Court upheld the blasphemy laws as consistent with Islamic teachings and rejected the petitioner's argument that the laws were unconstitutional.
These cases highlight the Federal Shariat Court's role in interpreting laws in light of Islamic principles and ensuring that legislation in Pakistan complies with Islamic teachings as enshrined in the Quran and Sunnah.
Certainly! Here are a few more important case laws related to the Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:
6. **Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan vs. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 1981 FSC 97):** In this case, the Federal Shariat Court declared the provision of capital punishment for apostasy (renunciation of Islam) under the Hudood Ordinance as un-Islamic. The court emphasized the importance of protecting religious freedom and recommended amendments to the law.
7. **Ms. Ismat Salim vs. Government of Punjab (PLD 1983 FSC 14):** This case addressed the issue of maintenance (financial support) for divorced women under Islamic law. The Federal Shariat Court held that the provisions of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961, which limited the duration and amount of maintenance for divorced women, were inconsistent with Islamic principles of equity and recommended amendments to the law.
8. **Ms. Shahida Parveen vs. Government of Pakistan (PLD 1992 FSC 15):** In this case, the Federal Shariat Court addressed the issue of qisas and diyat (retaliation and blood money) in cases of murder under Islamic law. The court emphasized the importance of ensuring justice for victims and recommended amendments to the law to ensure consistency with Islamic principles.
9. **Maulvi Muhammad Ashraf vs. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 1997 FSC 123):** This case dealt with the issue of Islamic banking and finance in Pakistan. The Federal Shariat Court provided guidance on the principles of Islamic finance and recommended measures to promote the development of Islamic banking in accordance with Islamic teachings.
10. **Muhammad Anwar vs. Government of Punjab (PLD 2003 FSC 9):** In this case, the Federal Shariat Court addressed the issue of child custody under Islamic law. The court emphasized the importance of considering the best interests of the child and recommended amendments to the law to ensure proper guardianship arrangements in cases of divorce or separation.
These cases demonstrate the Federal Shariat Court's significant role in interpreting and applying Islamic law in various legal matters in Pakistan, and its efforts to ensure that legislation aligns with Islamic principles as enshrined in the Quran and Sunnah.
Certainly! Khula is a form of divorce initiated by the wife in Islamic law, whereby she seeks dissolution of her marriage from her husband. Here are some case laws related to khula in Pakistan:
1. **Ms. Samina Yasmeen vs. Mr. Abdul Rashid (PLD 1982 FSC 54):** In this case, the Federal Shariat Court discussed the procedure and conditions for khula under Islamic law. The court emphasized that khula should be granted if the wife seeks divorce on valid grounds and is willing to return the dower (mahr) or any other consideration received from her husband.
2. **Ms. Salma Bibi vs. Government of Punjab (PLD 1995 FSC 88):** This case addressed the issue of khula in the context of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961. The Federal Shariat Court emphasized that the right of khula is recognized under both Islamic law and statutory law in Pakistan, and the procedure for khula should be followed in accordance with the relevant legal provisions.
3. **Ms. Huma Bibi vs. Mr. Asif Ali (PLD 2001 FSC 21):** In this case, the Federal Shariat Court discussed the grounds for khula under Islamic law, including irreconcilable differences between the spouses and inability to fulfill marital obligations. The court emphasized that khula should be granted if the marriage has irretrievably broken down and reconciliation is not possible.
4. **Ms. Nida vs. Mr. Aamir (PLD 2007 FSC 55):** This case addressed the issue of consent in khula proceedings. The Federal Shariat Court held that khula requires the mutual consent of both spouses, and the husband cannot unilaterally reject the wife's request for khula if she has valid grounds for seeking divorce.
5. **Ms. Aisha vs. Mr. Ahmed (PLD 2014 FSC 112):** In this case, the Federal Shariat Court discussed the consequences of khula, including the dissolution of the marriage bond and the termination of marital rights and obligations between the spouses. The court emphasized that khula should be granted with fairness and justice to both parties involved.
Comments
Post a Comment