How to draft Compromise deed and file in court of law during case or Razi nama karne ka tareeka in criminal cases
 |
| Compromise in Court |
 |
| Draft of razinama |
Many people want to compromise during (pending) court cases but don't know the right Process and in the result of long litigation in the Courts.
In Every case the compromise is acceptable by court except some criminal cases which are not compound able by law.
Before compromise you both parties to have talked with each other and come to the points when are acceptable for every party, parties can be two or more then two but mostly parties are two so if all the parties agree on some points for compromise the compromise can be done.
Prepare the agreement with signature of the parties and witnesses, explain everything in agreement all terms and conditions should be mention.
Precautions, some parties always mind of cheating and they cheat to other parties and after compromise they don't fullfil the terms and conditions so agreement should be so powerful that you can enforce it.
If you have any question or want to draft the agreement and consultation feel free to Whatsapp (+92-324-4010279)
Razi nama bht sare cases main hota hai. zamanat ke baad bht si parties sulah kar leti hain. lakin kuch cases criminal cases main qabal e razi nama hain or kuch nahi so naqabal e razi nama cases main log razi nama karne ke liye mukhtalif tareeke use karte hain. or kai baar gwah apne bian se mukar jate hain. jiss ki wajah se case khatam hu jata hai iss ke bare main
high court or supreme court ke faisle kia kehte hain aain dekhte hain
- Zamanat ke waqat razi nama kar lene ki soorat main baad main trial main inharaf nahi hu sakta qatal ke cases main or hurt ke cases main
- 2018 YLR 96 qatal
- 2017 YLR 1461 hurt
2-Razi nama agar zmanat ki had tak kia jai tu baad main trial per bar na hu ga
2016 YLR 2081 hurt
2012 YLR 791 hurt
2005 SCMR 1342 324 ppc
3-Maqtool ki koi olad na thi or BV ko qatal se pehle talak hu chuki thi maqtool ke bhai bhain razi nama ke ahal hain
2011 CLJ 81
4- robaroo court razi nama karne ki soorat main razi nama se inharaf nahi hu sakta. Judicial record ko jhutlaia na ja sakta hai
2008 PCrlj 126
5- Qatal case main razi nama ki soorat main 7ATA main Razi nama considre hu ga.
NLR 2017 Criminal 103
2016 Scmr 291
PLD 2014 SC 383
5-Juzvi razinama karne ki soorat main mulzam ko koi faida na hu ga tamam warsan ka razi nama karna zaroori hai
2016 PCrlj 1147
2015 SCMR 1064 (d)
6-Razi nama ki soorat main diat ki raqam mojoda rate ke mutabaq hu gi
2016 YLR 2085 (b)
2012 SCMR437 (b)
7-Ishtahari mulzam ki ghair mojodgi main razi nama hu sakta hai or Ishtahari mulzam ko bari kia ja sakta hai
2018 PCrlj 90 NOte 69
2012 PLD sind 35
Ghair muslim ke sath bhi razi nama hu sakta hai or ghair muslim fareekain main bhi razi nama hu sakta hai.
PLJ 2010 CrC 872
PLD 2010 Q 30 (B)
2001 Pcrlj 318 (b)
Razi nama ka matlab iqbal e juram hargiz na hai
PLD 2010 SC 695 (e)
maqtool ke sharai warisan ke marne ke baad in ke successor sulah kar sakte hain
2013 SCMR 1281
2013 PLJ SC 690
nabalagh ka natural guardian nabaligh ke nabaligh ke behalf per sulah kar sakta hai.
2008 PCrlj 455
2006 SD 311
PLJ 200 CRC 638
Gum shuda waris ki had tak diat raqam jama karwane ki soorat main baqi warsan ke bian halfi qalmband kar ke Mulzam ko bari kia ja sakta hai.
PLJ 2008 CRC 722
Ghair shadi shuda maqtool ke shari warisan maa or bap hun ge
عدالت ناقابل راضی نامہ کیس میں بھی اگر فریقین راضی نامہ کر لیں تو عدالت راضی نامہ کی بنیاد پرفیصلہ دے سکتی ھے۔
2007-MLD-1269-Karachi
ناقابل راضی نامہ جرائم میں بھی راضی نامہ کی بنیاد پر ضمانت ھو سکتی ھے
Offence of robbery as mentioned in section 392 of Pakistan Penal Code does not find mention in the table given in section 345, subsection (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and, therefore, is not compoundable. Similarly, section 411 of Pakistan Penal Code does not figure in the table mentioned under section 345, Cr.P.C. and, therefore, is not compoundable. However, the fact that the complainant himself has executed the affidavit, wherein he has undertaken that he has forgiven the petitioner/accused on the name of Allah Almighty and shall have no objection if the petitioner/accused is acquitted or released on bail after arrest, may be considered as the ground for the grant of bail in the interest of justice and equity. Where the complainant party is no longer willing to prosecute the matter any further then it is not for this Court or the Courts subordinate to it to compel the parties to do so, as the saying goes, “you can take the horse till the water but you cannot make him drink”.
مسلم اور غیر مسلم کے مابین راضی نامہ
PLD 2021 25
S.345 Cr.PC
S.302(b)& 34 PPC
Compromise between the Muslim and non Muslim .no restrictions on the legal hairs of the deceased who are the non Muslim to compound the offence and could no restrict the parties for interning into compromise...
345, Compromise, If the main offence is compoundable and parties, particularly injured/victim, have compromised against themselves then small offences should be treated as compromised, though under the statute they are not-compoundable.
Appellant was convicted under Ss. 324, 337, 382 & 506(2), P.P.C.
Appellant and complainant filed respective applications for compromise.
Both the parties had amicably settled all their differences.
Offences under Ss. 324 & 337, P.P.C. were compoundable whereas the offences under Ss. 382 & 506(2), P.P.C. did not find mention in the table of compoundable offences provided under S. 345, Cr.P.C.
Held; non-compoundability of a particular offence under any section of the enactment, was not to be read in isolation but it should be read in the background of each criminal case and beneficial interpretation should be given to the same.
High Court accepted the compromise applications and ordered acquittal of appellant from all the charges.
2020 P Cr. L J 278
[Sindh (Sukkur Bench)]
Before Muhammad Saleem Jessar, J
MANZOOR ALI---Appellant
Versus
The STATE---Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. S-83 of 2016, decided on 8th November, 2018.
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---
----S. 345---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324, 337, 382 & 506(2)---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, Shajjah, theft after preparation made for causing death, hurt or restraint in order to commit theft, criminal intimidation.
Appellant was convicted under Ss. 324, 337, 382 & 506(2), P.P.C.
Appellant and complainant filed respective applications for compromise.
Both the parties had amicably settled all their differences.
Offences under Ss. 324 & 337, P.P.C. were compoundable whereas the offences under Ss. 382 & 506(2), P.P.C. did not find mention in the table of compoundable offences provided under S. 345, Cr.P.C.
Held; non-compoundability of a particular offence under any section of the enactment, was not to be read in isolation but it should be read in the background of each criminal case and beneficial interpretation should be given to the same.
If the main offence is compoundable and parties, particularly injured/victim, have compromised against themselves then small offences should be treated as compromised, though under the statute they are not-compoundable.
High Court accepted the compromise applications and ordered acquittal of appellant from all the charges.
 |
| legalhelp1.com |
Comments
Post a Comment