Rent cases,arrears of rent, court proceeding Karaya daron ko nikalna . Ejectment of tenant before rent controller
Rent cases
Court for rental disputes(rent controller)
- Going to court for unpaid rent
- Going to court for rent arrears
- going to court for not paying rent
There is a lot litigation of rent matters around the world.
- First of all you will have to complete your rent agreement with all terms and conditions, terms and conditions should be same as law permission, illegal terms and conditions have not any value in the eyes of the law. If you want to draft an agreement or have any question,feel free to call.
- After the agreement there is immediately need to register the agreement as per law of the land. If you don't register your agreement, you will have to face problems in future if any dispute arise in future.
- After rent out the property you will have to keep complete record of rent what you paid as a tenant or received as landlord, because, if any dispute arise in future and, you go in court you will have to submit the copies of the agreement and receipts, monthly paid rent.
- If any dispute arise during the tenancy the both parties can go to the court and sue each other, if any one violation of rent agreement.
- If any party don't wanna go to the court, he can serve notice to other party through attorney of period a month or as period mention in agreement. If you want to send notice to other party or reply to the notice, demand letter or have any question, feel free to call or Whatsapp, +92-324-4010279
Legal notice
sab se pehla kam app ko ju karna hai wo yeh hai ke app ko apne krayadar ko aik legal notice behjna hai through your lawyer (register post) ke app se hum ko yeh problem hai ya yeh majboori hai or app aik month ke andar property khali kar dain .Notice ki aik copy or post office ki raseed app ne sanbhal kar rakhni hai or aik mah ke baad agar wo property khali nahi karta tu app rent controller ke pass dawa dair kar sakte hain .
Documents
- copy id card Mudai
- Copy karaya nama
- other any related documents
- copy legal notice
- copy post office receipt
Procedure
App ko through Lawyer court main dawa dair karna hu ga . or yeh dawa buhat speedy chalta hai . or jald hi faisla hu jata hai or app ki property khali karwa di jati hai . High Court or Supreme ke Faisle
Maqrara tareekh per karaya dena karya dar ka faraz hai kraya scurity ki raqam se kata nahi ja sakta
Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us . Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people about there rights and how can get their rights .so we need to your help to achieve our goal . plz tell people about this blog and subscribe our you tube channel and follow us at the end of this post .
20018 CLC 161
yaktarfa karwai ko khatam karke karaya dar ko maqdma larne ka haq hona chahye.
2018 MLD 162
Question of Title is not relevent before rent controler
2018 YLR 1240
mabain fareekain mahda hoa tha ke koi fareeq rent controler ke pass nahi jai ga iss ke bawajood munasib karya teh karna rent controler ka ikhtiar hai.
2018 SCMR 581
Senior civil judge khud bhi case ki smat kar sakta hai (rent ribunal) or kisi dosre ahal judge ko bhi saamat ke liye bhajwa sakta hai
PLD 2018 LAH 390 (9)
Landlord may not be essentially an owner of the property
2018 MLD 1231
tajdeed mahda karya karte waqat ada katda raqam pagri taswar hu gi
PLJ 2017 L 797
malak makan bv bacho ki zarroorat ke liye karye dar se makan khali karwane ke liye bv bacho ko batoor gwa pesh karne ka paband na hai.
2017 MLD 605
Malik makan bv bachu ke ilawa apne degar ahal e khana ki zarroora ke liye bhi makan khali karwa sakta hai
2017 MLD 605
jadeed banai dawa per dosri darkhwast bedakhli karyadar dair ki ja sakti hai
2017 YLR 1762
Mushtarka malkiat ki soorat main aik malak ki tarf se kia gia mahda dosre malak per qabal e pabandi na hai
PLJ 2017\L 797
Darkhwasat bedakhli ka faisla 4 mah ke andar karna lazmi hai.
2017 MLD 53
duran e karya dari mahda bai aor dawa e tameel e mukhtis zair samat hone ki bana per darkhawast bedakhli kharaj na hu gi
2016 CLC 1832
Darkhwast bedakhli bazreea Attorney bhi dair ki ja sakti hai Landlord ki asaltan hazri zaroori na hai.
2016 YLR 293
tahreeri Mahda karya dari ki adam mojodgi main karaya dari ki mudat sirf aik mah taswar hu gi. Aik dafa defaulter hone ki soorat main bad azan karya ada karna bhi karaya dar ko koi faida na de ga.
2016MLD 103
2015 CLC 1187
Mahda karya dari ka tahreeri hona lazam hai
2016 YLR 405
rent controler ke darmiani hukam ke khalaf writ petition na hu sakti hai
2015 CLC663 (b)
Mahda karya dari ya raseed karya dari ki adam mojodgi ki soorat main malak or karayadar ka talaq saabat na hu ga
PLJ 2015 Pesh 121
dawa bedakhli main bazareea cross check rent ki adaigi na hu sakti hai
2015 SCMR 642
Rent controlor ke yaktarfa order mansookh karwane ki mayad 30 din hai
2015CLC 620(b)
rupee ki qadar kam hone ki waja se pagri ki raqam main azafa ka faisla karna bhi rent controler ka farz hai kionke malak ne waqat ke sath karya barha dia tha
2015 YLR 1617
Malak makan ke foat ka ilam hone ke bawajood karyadar malak makan ke nam karya jama karwata raha . aisa karna default ke zumre main aaye ga
2015 YLR 1179
qasdan karya jama na karwane ki soorat main karya dar ko bedakhal kia ja sakta hai
2015CLC229
2014 YLR 791
2014MLD 1113
2014 CLC 929
karya dar ya us ki jaga karya ada karne ki under taking dene wala shakhas bhi karya dar ya tent ke zumre main aaye ga
2015 MLD 171
Agar karya dar har mah ki 5 tareekh se pehle karya jama na karwai tu us ka haq e dafa khatam kia ja sakta hai
2015MLD 1342
kisi dosre shakhas ki jaga karya wasool karne wala shakhas bhi landlord ke zumre main aata hai.
2015 MLD 171
2015 YLR 1179
2011 MLD 1383
Mahda karya dari ka register hona zaroori hai warna jurmana ada kiye bghair dawa kharaj hu ga
2015 YLR 2045
PLD 2013 SC 775
2013 SCMR 1520
Dawa bedakhli ka faisla karte waqat pagri ka faisla karna bhi rent controler ki zimadari hai
2015 YLR 1617
Ejectment order by rent controler cannot be interfered by civil court
2014 SCMR 1210
Malak ki tarf se karya wasool na karne ki soorat main karya court main jama karwaia ja sakta hai
2014 MLD1084
Cantt ki hadood main punjab karyadari act 2009 ka itlaq na hu ga
2014CLC 832
adaigi karya ko raseedat se saabat na karna bedakhli ki maqool wajh hu gi
2014MLD1012
bowaqat dairy dawa bedakhli agar karyadar foat hu jai ty darkhwast bedakli qabile rawan na hai
20l14 YLR 2598
Agar karya dar court ke hukam ke bawajood agar karya ada na kare tu iss ka haq dafa khatam kar dia jai ga
2014CLC 929
karyedar ko jaidad matdwia main apna koi haq saabat karne ke liye pehle jaidad ko khali karna lazmi hai
2013YLR2714
defaulter saabat hone ki soorat main iss se matalq issue frame karna lazam hai
2013CLC 258
Pagri karyadari ko la mahdood nahi kar sakti
2013 SCMR 1520
Dawa bedakhli jurmana jama na karwane ki soorat main kharaj na hu ga jurmana baad main bhi jama karwaia ja sakta hai
2013YLR473
Rent ke mamlat main nagrani na hu sakti hai
PLJ 2011 L 745
karyadar mahda main tosee ka matalba batoor haq na kar sakta hai
2011 CLC 765
Malak makan ki ijazat ke bghair amarat main tameer bedakhli ki maqool wajah hai
2010 CLC 819
Tameel ke baad 10 din ke andar andar leave to defend ki darkhwast na dair karna ki soorat main karya dari ka right close hu jai ga
2010 YLR 109
2010 CLC 847
Mahda karyadari karne ki soorat main malak makan or karyadari k rishta se inkar na kia ja sakta hai
PLD 2010 L 281
PLD 2009 L 429
kisi building ki malkiat change karte waqat karyadar ko notice dena lazam na hai
2010 MLD 1988
karya dari ki mudat aik saal se ziada hone ki soorat main karya nama ko register karwana lazm hai
2009 YLR2294
dawa tameel mukhtas ki decree hone ki soorat main karya dar ko ghair qanooni toor pr bedakhal na kia ja sakta hai karya dar nai malik ka karyadar taswar hu ga
2009 MLD 286
karyadar ki tarf se bijli ke bill ki adam adaigi default ke zumre main aati hai
2008CLC 446
Rent controler ki samat per zabta diwani ka itlaq na hota hai
2004 CLC178(b)
mahda karya dari ka register hona lazm na hai
PLD 2003 L 204
dehati aalaqa main waqia building karyadari qanoon ka itlaq na hu ga
2002 YLR 1353
malak makan ka barhalf bian ke building bonafide use ke liye chahye durast tasleem hu ga
1997 SCMR 1062
Shahdat qalm band kiye bghair karyadar or malak makan ke rishta ka faisla na kia ja sakta hai
1995 CLC 66
Rent controler ke darmiani ahkamat ke khalaf appeal na hu sakti hai
1998 CLC 298
Mushtarka khata dar karyadar na hu sakta hai
1996CLC 137
karaya dari ke iktam per karya dar property ko achi halat main wapis karne ka zimadar hai
PLD 1995 SC 351
For more information call us 0092-324-4010279 Whatsapp
Dear readers if u like this post plz comments and follow us . Thanks for reading .as you know our goal is to aware people about there rights and how can get their rights .so we need to your help to achieve our goal . plz tell people about this blog and subscribe our you tube channel and follow us at the end of this post .
Popular Posts
Rent agreement and mortgage agreement if joint.
Thr following judgement is writ petition challenge the orders of the rent controller and district judge.
Brief story of the case is that the rent agreement and mortgage agreement joint and 100000 rupees was deposited as mortgage and 6000 rent was fix and after some years additional 30000 was deposited and rent was enhanced 6000 to 8000
Court discuss different case laws and finally dismiss the appeal
For more information call or Whatsapp 03244010279
Judgement
W.P. No. 6807/2016
Mst. Shahnaz Bibi
Siraj Din etc.
23.11.2020
Syed Mazhar Hussain Shah, Advocate for the
petitioner.
Mian Zulfiqar Rahi, Advocate for respondent
No. 1.
Through this Constitutional petition
filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of
Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973
concurrent findings recorded by the Special
Judge (Rent) as well as by the learned Addl.
District Judge, Lahore dated 18.05.2013 and
30.01.2016, respectively, have been
challenged whereby the ejectment petition
filed by respondent No.1
against the
petitioner in respect of the property
measuring 6-marla (described in the petition)
situated at Maryam Siddiqa Colony,
Shahdara Town, Lahore was allowed.
2.
Briefly, the facts giving rise to the
filing of the present petition are that the
respondent No.1 hypothetically got the
possession of said house of 6-marla from the
W.P. No. 6807/2016
2
petitioner through a Usufruct Mortgaged
Deed dated 30.01.2009
against
Rs.
1,00,000/- but the said document also
contained a condition that during the period
of five years the petitioner would continue to
pay Rs. 6000/- as monthly rent before 16th of
every month to the respondent No.1 from
whom she got the possession as a tenant and
that after re-payment of the said mortgage
money to respondent No.1, petitioner will
convert the possession of the said property as
the owner. Meanwhile, the petitioner also
received Rs. 30,000/- from respondent No.1
as additional mortgage money on 13.02.2010
and the monthly rent was re-settled at Rs.
8000/- per month payable by the petitioner
to respondent No.1. But when it was not paid,
ejectment petition was filed by the respondent
No.1 against the petitioner on 29.04.2011 on
the ground of default in payment of rent for
17 months; breach of terms of agreement as
well as expiry of the period of tenancy and
personal use. The petitioner, however, filed
W.P. No. 6807/2016
3
the application for leave to contest. The
learned Special Judge (Rent) had proceeded
ex-parte against the petitioner on 20.09.2011
and the application to set aside the said exparte order filed by the petitioner was
dismissed on 17.04.2012, whereafter the exparte evidence was produced by respondent
No.1, and the ejectment order was passed
on 18.05.2013 while granting 60 days to the
petitioner to vacate the premises besides
meanwhile, directing her to continue to pay
rent @ Rs. 8000/- per month. The petitioner
filed the appeal which too was dismissed on
30.01.2016, granting her 45 days for
vacation of
premises, hence this writ
petition.
3.
Arguments heard. File perused.
4.
After hearing the learned counsel for
the parties and perusing the file, it is
straightway observed that the recitals of the
Mortgage Deed reveals it to be a Usufruct
Mortgage with an additional clause of
payment of rent, but this document was not
W.P. No. No. 6807/2016
4
registered. At the time of execution of the
document, The West Pakistan Urban Rent
Restriction Ordinance, 1959 was applicable
and according to Section 2(c) thereof, the
landlord includes “…..any person for the time
being entitled to receive rent in respect of any
building…….” and under Section 2(i) of the
said Ordinance, “any person by whom or on
whose account rent is payable” is a tenant.
However, at the time when the ejectment
petition was filed, the Punjab Rented
Premises Act, 2009, was in field (w.e.f.
17.11.2009) and under Section 2(d) landlord
means the owner of premises and includes a
person for the time being entitled or
authorized to receive the rent and under
Section 2(L), a tenant means a person who
undertakes or is bound to pay rent as
consideration for the occupation of the
premises. These definitions under new law
are exhaustive as they do not specify the
existence of tenancy alone but the
5
ground/reasons for occupation of the
premises.
5.
Here it would be important to dilate
upon the said mortgage deed in view of the
judgment passed in case titled ASIF RAZA
MIR versus MUHAMMAD KHURSHID KHAN
(2011 SCMR 1917), in which it was held that
it is not the title but the contents of the
document which will determine its nature
and that the true intention of the parties
must be given effect. Admittedly, the title is
)گروی( رھن نامہ اقرار which was written on a
stamp paper issued in the name of the
petitioner on 30.01.2009. It was not
registered either as a mortgage deed or as
Rent Agreement, until the learned Special
Judge (Rent) ordered the respondent to
deposit fine equivalent to 10% of the annual
value of rent in terms of Section 9(b) of the
Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009 on
30.04.2011 whereafter the notices were
issued to the petitioner. The court, therefore,
acknowledged the status of document as a
rent agreement which was not challenged by
the petitioner. Besides, the petitioner had
admitted the execution of the said document
which also contains the condition for the
payment of rent @ 6000/- per month by the
petitioner which was enhanced to Rs.8000/-
per month on 13.12.2010 after receiving
Rs.30,000/- as additional mortgage money by
the petitioner which was also written on the
back of the stamp paper, showing the
intention of the parties to operate as rent
agreement. Importantly, neither the petitioner
had filed any suit for redemption nor
respondent No.1 filed suit for recovery of
amount on the basis of the usufruct
mortgage, therefore,
the
irresistible
conclusion is that for all intents and
purposes it was a rent agreement and the
relationship of landlord and tenant existed,
notwithstanding the title and terms of
mortgage deed with regard to possession.
Reliance is placed upon ABDUS SALAM and 2
others versus Ch. NOOR MUHAMMAD (1991
W.P. No. 6807/2016
7
SCMR 2346). Even otherwise, rent paid in
the usufruct mortgage is the absolute
acknowledgement of the status of the
petitioner as tenant. Reliance is placed upon
ABDUL HAQ versus ALI AKBAR and others
(1999 SCMR 2531). As regards to the
possession of the property in usufruct
mortgage, it can be termed as possession of
the mortgagor as tenant as held forty years
ago in Mst. MAQBOOL AND OTHERS versus
SAMANDAR KHAN (PLD 1969 Peshawar
216).
Even before, in the case titled
MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH versus ABDUL
JABBAR (PLD 1967 Lahore 1000) it was
held, that unlike in the present case, where
two agreements i.e. mortgage and rent of
different dates were simultaneously executed,
it would be a mortgage, unlike held in case
reported as
RAZA HUSSAIN versus
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL (PLD 1973 Note 114)
(Lahore) that such a mortgagee can eject the
mortgagor in the ejectment proceedings
(which are summary in nature) as the
W.P. No. 6807/2016
8
relationship of landlord and tenant existed
between the parties. This view is respectfully
followed and it is hereby held that the
petitioner was rightly ejected and that two
courts below have not committed any
illegality warranting interference in the
exercise of constitutional jurisdiction of this
court particularly in the absence of suit for
redemption or suit for right of foreclosure.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed on
merits.
[
(ALI BAQAR NAJAFI)
JUDGE
Approved for reporting.
JUDGE
sir mera name Hamza hai or main ne bacholers IT main kiya hai or ab lahore main aik software house main job kr raha hun.
ReplyDeletemujhay takreeban 2 saal se ziyada arsa ho gaya hai lahore main rehtay hoay. waisay main basically sahiwal city se taluk rekhta hun.
kuch dino pehlay main ne apnay hostel mates ke sth mil ke flat shift kiya hai.
ab ham jis new jagha ay hain udr ham ne aik property delear ke sth rabta kiya tha jis ne hamaiyn aik ghr ka 3rd floor pe portion dikhaya jiska rent 16K tha... ham ne 10k ka tokan de diya usi time and hamaiyn kaha gaya ke ap 2 ya max 3 din main shiffting kr laiyn. but 3 din baad jan ham ne shiffting krni thi ti hamaiyn kaha gaya ke wo makan to property owner ne kisi or party ko de diya hai so apko koi or dikha detay hain and then aik din baad usi ghr main 2nd floor pe hamaiyn flat dikhaya jiska rebt bhi 16K hi bataya gaya.
phir koi 3 4 din ke baad jab ham ne shiffting krni thi to again hamaiyn aik 2 din mazeed delay krwaya gaya and dinally koi totall 18 din baad ham saman le ke flat main pohanchay.
ab jab saman shift ho gaya to malik ne kaha ke rent de daiyn 17k.
ham ne bataya ke baat 16K ki hoi thi propery delear ke sth..
jab ke malik ne saaf inkar kr diya ke main to 17k main hi dun ga.
ham again property delear ke pass gay and bht koshish ki ke rent wohi ho jay jiska hamaiyn kaha gaya tha lekin baat na ban saki.
Finally ham ne apna token wapis le liya bcz is property delear ne bht ziyada galat biyani ki thi hamaray sth.
then ham aik property delear ke pass gay and un se request ki or again malik se baat ki but still malik ne 17k hi kaha... ab ham saman shift kr chukay thy or kisi or jagha ja nahi sktay thy so ham ne us property delear ke through malik ke sth 17k ka done kr liya...
ab wo porana property delear a ke hamaiyn tang karta hai ke makan main ne dikhaya tha commission mujhay do.
jab ke wo tokan to cancel ho gaya tha and ham ne new property delear ke through mahida kr liya hai.
so ap se guzarish hai ke is mamlay main agr ap apni ray de daiyn ke hamaiyn kia karna chahiay to main apka bht ahsan mand hun ga.
main isi maslay se related internet pe search kr raha tha tbhi apka number mila so socha apko mes kr ke daikh lon.
agr ap is saray mamlay ka koi haal bata sakaiyn to apka bht ehsan ho ga. bcz kafi pareshan han ham sab ke ab kia kiya jay