Ahmadi ( qadiani) Appeal dismiss by high court. Upheld the decision of DCO.
The case concerns the cancellation of the declaration for the Ahmadiyya community's monthly magazine "Misbah" due to its alleged propagation of Ahmadiyya beliefs, which is prohibited under Section 298-C of the Pakistan Penal Code.
### Key Points:
1. **Muttehida Ulema Board's Recommendation**:
- The Board recommended canceling the magazine's declaration, citing objectionable material promoting Ahmadiyya beliefs.
2. **District Coordination Officer's Notice**:
- The DCO issued a notice to Mr. Tahir Mehdi Imtiaz Ahmad Warraich, the magazine's printer, to explain the allegations.
3. **Hearing and Decision**:
- After reviewing the case, the DCO concluded that "Misbah" violated the law and ordered the cancellation of its declaration.
4. **Appeal**:
- Mr. Warraich appealed the decision, arguing lack of authority and discrimination.
- The court dismissed the appeal, finding the cancellation lawful and properly reasoned.
### Court's Short Order:
The appeal against the cancellation of the declaration for the monthly magazine "Misbah" is dismissed. The order dated February 15, 2012, by the District Coordination Officer, Chiniot, stands affirmed, canceling the declaration due to the publication's propagation of Ahmadiyya beliefs, in violation of Section 298-C PPC.
The appeal against the cancellation of the Ahmadiyya community's magazine "Misbah" is dismissed. The February 15, 2012, order by the District Coordination Officer, Chiniot, is upheld. The magazine's declaration is canceled for propagating Ahmadiyya beliefs, violating Section 298-C of the Pakistan Penal Code.
Stereo. H C J D A 38
JUDGMENT SHEET
IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
JUDGMENT
Press Appeal No.225/2012
Tahir Mehdi Imtiaz
Ahmad Warraich
VS.
Government of Punjab through
Secretary, Home Department
etc.
Ch. Muhammad Iqbal, J:- Through this appeal under
Section 20 of the Press, Newspapers, News Agencies and Books
Registration Ordinance 2002, the appellant has challenged the
validity of order dated 15.02.2012 passed by the District
Coordination Officer, Chiniot who while invoking jurisdiction
under Section 19 of the Ordinance ibid, cancelled the declaration
in respect of Monthly Magazine “Misbah” and the appellant/
printer was directed to stop the circulation of the said magazine.
2.
Brief facts of the case as stated by learned counsel for the
appellant are that the appellant is the publisher of Monthly
Magazine “Misbah” [hereinafter referred to as the “magazine”]
published from Chanab Nagar (Rabwah) District Chiniot for the
female followers of Quadiani group. The original publisher
namely, Sh. Khurshid Ahmad had died and the appellant has
applied for substituting his place as such the respondent No.2 has
treated the appellant as publisher. The appellant received a show
cause notice (No.1532 dated 01.02.2012) from respondent
Press Appeal No.225/2012
2
No.2/D.C.O, Chiniot wherein it was mentioned that the magazine
contained objectionable material under Section 298-C of the
Pakistan Penal Code and appellant was further called upon that as
to why the magazine should not be banned and its declaration be
cancelled under Section 19 of the Press, Newspapers, News
Agencies and Books Registration Ordinance 2002. The appellant
appeared before the respondent No.2 on 06.02.2012 and also got
recorded his statement regarding compliance of law. On
15.02.2012, the appellant received an order from the respondent
No.2 whereby the declaration in respect of the magazine was
cancelled and order was passed to stop the printing, publication
and circulation of the said magazine. Hence, this appeal.
3.
I have heard learned counsels for the parties and have
gone through the record.
4.
The matter in issue relates to cancellation of declaration of
press/ publication of a magazine/Misbah. Under Article 19 of the
Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973
[hereinafter referred to as “Constitution”], every citizen has a
right of freedom of speech and expression as well as freedom of
the press but said rights can only be enjoyed subject to the
conditions imposed in the said Article as well as the law. For
ready reference, Article 19 of the Constitution is reproduced as
under:
“19.
Every citizen shall have the right to freedom of speech and
expression, and there shall be freedom of the press, subject to any
reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of glory of
Islam or the integrity, security or defence of Pakistan or any part
thereof, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency
or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, commission of or
incitement to an offence.”
(emphasis supplied)
As the matter in issue relates to the publication of a magazine
which publication falls within the domain of “press” and the
Article ibid while guaranteeing the freedom of press gives
Press Appeal No.225/2012
3
authority to impose restriction in accordance with law. For press
entities, an Ethical Code of Practice has been given in the
Schedule of the Press Council of Pakistan Ordinance, 2002,
which is reproduced as under:
“Schedule
(See Section 8 (I) (iv))
Ethical Code of Practice
An Ethical Code, of Practice is formulated as under for the
press for the purpose of its functioning in accordance with the
canons of decency, principles of professional conduct and precepts
of freedom and responsibility to serve the public interest by
ensuring an unobstructed flow of news and views to the people
envisaging that honestly accuracy, objectivity and fairness shall be
the guidelines for the press while serving the public interest in any
form of publication such as news items, articles, editorials, features
cartoons, illustrations, photographs and advertisements: etc-
(1) The press shall strive to uphold standards of morality and
must avoid plagiarism and publication of slanderous and libelous
material.
(2) The press shall strive to publish and disclose all essential
and relevant facts and ensure that the information it disseminates is
fair and accurate.
(3) The press shall avoid biased reporting or publication of
unverified material, and avoid the expression of comments and
conjecture as established fact, Generalization based on the
behaviour of an individual or a small number of individuals will be
termed unethical.
(4) The press shall respect the privacy of individuals and shall
do nothing which tantamounts to an intrusion into private, family
life and home;
(5) Rumours and unconfirmed reports shall be avoided and if
at all published shall be identified as such.
(6) The information, including picture, disseminated shall be
true and accurate.
(7) The press shall avoid originating, printing, publishing and
disseminating any material, which encourages or incites
discrimination or hatred on grounds of race, religion, caste, sect,
nationality, ethnicity, gender, disability, illness, or age, of an
individual or group.
(8) The press shall not lend itself to the projection of crime as
heroic and the criminals as heroes.
(9) The press shall avoid printing, publishing or disseminating
any material, which may bring into contempt Pakistan or its people
or tends to undermine its sovereignty or integrity as an independent
country
Press Appeal No.225/2012
4
(10) The press shall not publish or disseminate any material or
expression, which is violative of Article 19 of the Constitution of
the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
(11) The press shall rectify promptly any harmful
inaccuracies, ensure that corrections and apologies receive due
prominence and afford the right of reply to persons criticized or
commented upon when the issue is of sufficient importance.
(12) While reporting on medical issues, care must be taken to
avoid sensationalism, which could arouse baseless fears or false
hopes in the readers. Early research finding should not be presented
as though they were conclusive or almost conclusive.
(13) Sensationalism of violence and brutalities shall be
avoided. All reporting shall be accurate, particularly when Court
proceedings are covered and an accused person must not be
presented as guilty before judgment has been pronounced.
(14) In the cases, of sexual offences and heinous crime against
children, juveniles and women, names and identifying photographs
shall not be published.
(15) Confidentiality agreed upon at briefings and background
interviews must be observed.
(16) The press while publishing findings of opinion polls and
surveys shall indicate the number of people, geographical area on
which the polls and surveys were conducted, and the identify of the
poll-sponsor.
(17) Any kind of privilege or inducement, financial or
otherwise, which is likely to create conflict of interest and any
inducement offered to influence the performance of professional
duties and is not compatible with the concept of a reputable,
independent and responsible press, must be avoided.”
The crux of the aforesaid Ethical Code of Practice is that no one
including “press” is allowed to violate the honor of any
individual and the state of Pakistan as well as the religion of
Islam.
5.
Further, Section 5 of the Press, Newspapers, News
Agencies and Books Registration Ordinance 2002 deals with the
directions regarding publishing material in the publication
whereas Section 6 of the Ordinance ibid directs the printer to
submit declaration with the undertaking to abide by the
aforementioned Ethical Code of Practice. For ready reference,
Sections 5 & 6 of the Ordinance ibid are reproduced as under
Press Appeal No.225/2012
5
“5. Publication of newspapers.--No newspaper shall be published
except in conformity with the provisions of this Ordinance and
without prejudice to the provisions of Section 3, every copy of
every such newspapers shall contain the name of the owner and
editor thereof printed clearly on such copy and also the date of its
publication. Similarly, no news agency shall disseminate or defuse
news except in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance
unless there subsists a declaration authenticated by the District
Coordination Officer.
6. Declaration of the printer, publisher and news agency.-- (1)
The printer and publisher of every newspaper or an owner of news
agency shall appear in person or by agent authorised in this behalf
before the District Co-ordination Officer within whose local
jurisdiction such newspaper shall be printed or published, or news
agency ordinarily operates and shall make and subscribe, in
duplicate originals a declaration in Form 'B' or in such other form as
may be prescribed, and the District Co-ordination Officer shall,
immediately upon the filing of such form, issue a receipt for the
same.
(2) Every declaration shall specify the title of the newspaper, the
language in which it is to be published, the periodicity of its
publication and shall contain such other particulars as may be
prescribed to include bank where account will be operated and
financial funding, if any.
(3) Where the printer or publisher of a newspaper making a
declaration is not the owner thereof, the declaration shall specify the
name of the owner and shall also be accompanied by an authority in
writing from the owner authorising such person to make and
subscribe such declaration.
(4) The declaration of news agency shall contain its name, language
of dissemination of news and credit lines to include bank where
account will be operated.
(5) Submission of declaration and its authentication under this
Ordinance shall be necessary before the publication of newspaper or
dissemination of news by any news agency.
(6) The declaration submitted by the publisher under sub-section (5)
shall be accompanied by an undertaking by the editor to abide by
the Ethical Code of Practice contained in the Schedule to the Press
Council of Pakistan Ordinance, 2002.”
The appellant is follower of Quadiani group and the magazine in
question was being used to preach and propagate teaching of the
said group which is prohibited under Section 298-C of Pakistan
Penal Code, 1860 (PPC). As per Section 298-C PPC, every
person of Quadiani group has been banned not only from posing
himself as a Muslim but also from preaching or propagating his
Press Appeal No.225/2012
6
faith. For ready reference, Section 298-C PPC is reproduced as
under:
“298C. Person of Quadiani group, etc., calling himself a
Muslim or preaching or propagating his faith.__Any person
of the Quadiani group or the Lahori group (who call
themselves ‘Ahmadis’ or by any other name) who, directly or
indirectly, poses himself as a Muslim, or calls, or refers to, his
faith as Islam, or preaches or propagates his faith, or invites
others to accept his faith, by words, either spoken or written, or
by visible representations, or in any manner whatsoever
outrages the religious feelings of Muslims, shall be punished
with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.”
Under Section 19 of the Press, Newspapers, News Agencies and
Books Registration Ordinance 2002, the parameters for
cancellation of declaration of a newspaper are given. For ready
reference, aforesaid provision is reproduced as under:
“19. Cancellation of declaration. – (1) On the application of the
Press Registrar either suo moto or based on the information through
any person, the District Co-ordination Officer empowered to
authenticate a declaration under this Ordinance, is of opinion that
any declaration made in respect of a newspaper should be cancelled,
he may, after giving the person concerned an opportunity of
showing cause against the action proposed to be taken, hold an
enquiry into the matter and if, after considering the cause, if any,
shown by such parties and after giving them reasonable opportunity
of being heard, he is satisfied that;
(a) the news paper, in respect of which the declaration has
been made is being published in contravention of the
provisions of this Ordinance or rules made their under; or
(b) the newspaper mentioned in the declaration bears a title
which is the same as or similar to, that of any other newspaper
published either in the same language or in the country; or
(c) the printer and publisher has ceased to be the printer or
publisher of the newspaper mentioned in such declaration; or
(d) the declaration was made on knowingly false
representation on the concealment of any material fact or in
respect of a periodical work which is not a newspaper; the
District Co-ordination Officer may, by order, cancel the
declaration and shall forward as soon as possible a copy of the
order to the person making or subscribing the declaration and
also to the Press Registrar.
(2) During the period of sixty days of the cancellation order no
person shall be issued a declaration in the name of the same title to
any other perso
Press Appeal No.225/2012
7
The appellant while obtaining the declaration of magazine,
submitted his affidavit-cum-undertaking to abide by the
provisions of the Ordinance ibid as well as the Rules and
Regulations made thereunder but subsequently he has committed
blatant grave violations to the aforesaid declaration.
6.
However, as an abandoned caution, the Chief Minister,
Punjab constituted Muthida Ulma Board Punjab to ascertain
regarding preaching of objectionable material. The said Board in
its meeting held on 27.06.2011 after perusing the contents of the
magazine, recommended for cancellation of its declaration on the
ground of publishing objectionable material. For reference,
relevant portion of the decision dated 27.06.2011 is reproduced as
under:
6- امانہہم ابصمح
امرچ 2001
رمزا لیلخ ادمح
رمق
اقدایین ذمبہ یک غیلبت رپ لمتشم وماد رپ ینبم اس
راسہلرپاپدنبیاوراساکڈی کلرنشیوسنمخ
رکےن یک افسرش یک اجیت ےہ۔
ہمکحم داہلخ اجنپب
In this regard, Home Department, Government of the Punjab
issued a notification dated 26.10.2011, by holding that the
magazine contains a deliberate mischief of malicious and
objectionable material. For reference, aforesaid notification is
reproduced as under:
“Government of the Punjab
Home Department
Dated Lahore the 26th October, 2011
NOTIFICATION
No. SO (IS-III) 6-15/2010 WHEREAS, the Government of Punjab
is satisfied that the following books/booklets/ Magazines/News
Papers contain matter which is objectionable and
deliberately/maliciously intended to outrage religious feelings:-
Sr.
#
TITLED
WRITTEN BY
NATURE
1
Mahmood Ahmad
Abbasi (Aqaid-oNazriat)/Khalafat Hazrat
Amir Muawaia & Yazid
(Book)
Syed Ali Mutahar
Naqvi Amrohi
Sectarian
Press Appeal No.225/2012
8
2
Yeh Teesri Eid (Booklet) Eng. Abdul
Qaddus Salfi
Sectarian
3
Eid Milad-un-Nabi ki
Haqeeqat (Booklet)
Abu Muawia
Maulana
Muhammad Ayaz
Sectarian
4
Way of Seekers (Book)
Mriza Bashir-udDin Mahmood
Ahmad
Sectarian
5
Al-Fazal (Weekly &
Daily)
Abdul Samih
Khan
Sectarian
6
Monthly Misbah, March,
2001 (Magazine)
Mirza Khalil
Ahmad Qamar
Sectarian
7
New Canada (Magazine) Syed Hasnat
Ahmad
Sectarian
2. Now therefore, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 99-
A Cr.P.C 1898, the Government of the Punjab is pleased to ban and
confiscate all copies of the above mentioned books/ booklets/
Magazines/Newspapers alongwith its translation in any language,
wherever found in open market or at any Madrissa, with immediate
effect.
Secretary to Govt. of the Punjab
Home Department”
The Home Department, Government of the Punjab issued
direction to the District Coordination Officer, Chiniot on
27.10.2011 and recommended for cancellation of declaration of
magazine for publishing objectionable material. For reference,
letter dated 27.10.2011 is reproduced as under:
“NO.SO (IS.III) 6-15/2010
GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
HOME DEPARTMENT
Dated Lahore, the 27th October, 2011
To
The District Coordination Officer,
Chiniot
Subject:-
CANCELLATION OF DECLARATION
OF MONTHLY MISBAH
I am directed to convey that the Muttehida Ulama
Board Punjab has recommended cancellation of declaration of
monthly Magazine “Misbah” for publishing objectionable material
in its meeting held on 27.06.2011.
2.
I am further directed to request that necessary
action may please be taken in the matter under intimation to this
Press Appeal No.225/2012
9
Department according to Pakistan Newspapers, News Agencies and
Books Registration Ordinance, 2002.
Section Officer (IS.III)”
In view of the aforesaid facts, a show cause notice under Section
19 of the Press, Newspapers, News Agencies and Books
Registration Ordinance 2002 was issued on 01.02.2012 to the
appellant with the allegation that the magazine is being used to
preach the teachings of Qadiani group which practic is prohibited
under Section 298-C PPC. For ready reference, the notice dated
01.02.2012 is reproduced as under:
"ازدرتفڈرٹسٹکوکآرڈی نی ش نآرسیفوینچٹ
01-02-2012 ومرہخ 1532 ربمن
ونسٹ انبم:- اطرہ دہمی اایتمز ادمح وڑاچئ رپرٹن امانہہم "ابصمح" انچب رگن
زری دہعف 19رپسی وینز رپیپ، وینز ایسنجی و کب ررٹسجنشی آرڈسننی 2002
یملق ےہ ہک امانہہم "ابصمح" اک رشلبپ وفت وہ اکچ ےہ ہکبج آپ امانہہم ذموکر ےک رپرٹن
ںیہاورآپےنرباےئدبتیلیی ن لن کی ش ندرتفذہاںیم دروخاتس دے ریھک ےہ۔
امہرے ملع ںیم ہی ابت آیئ ےہ ہک امانہہم "ابصمح" یک ااشتع اجری ےہ۔ سج ںیم
اقدتین یک غیلبت یک اجیت ےہ۔ وج ہک زری دہعف 298/Cزعتریات اپاتسکن اقلب وماذخہ ےہ۔
ذہلا آپ وک ہقلعتم رفقی رگداےتن وہےئ ذبرہعی ونسٹ ذہا علطم ایک اجات ےہ ہک آپ
ومرہخ 06.02.2012وک وبتق 11:30ےجب درتف احرض آرک وہج ایبن رکںی ہک ویکں ہن ااشتع امانہہم
"ابصمح"رپاپدنبیاگلرکڈی کلی رنشیوسنمخایکاجےئ۔دعماحرضییکوصرتںیمبسحاضہطباکروایئ
لمع ںیم الیئ اجوے یگ۔
ڈرٹسٹکوکآرڈی نی ش نآرسیف
وینچٹ
اٹنٹسس رنشمک الایلں ونسٹ ہیلع یک لیمعت بسح اضہطب رکواںیئ اور ونسٹ دعب لیمعت لبق از اترخی واسپ
اراسل رکںی۔
ڈرٹسٹکوکآرڈی نی ش نآرسیف
وینچٹ"
In response to the aforesaid notice, the appellant filed following
written reply on 06.02.2012:
م-ےکونسٹےکہلسلسںیم احرض وہا۔ آن مکرمےسدروخاتسےھہکامانھہم
ایبن رب فلح:
"اخاسکرآن مکر
مکرمےسدروخاتسےھہکاسےک
"ابصمح" ںیم وکیئ اقلب ارتعاض وماد اشعئ ںیہن وہات۔
آن
ڈی کلرنشیوکلسنیکہنایکاجےئ
Press Appeal No.225/2012
10
The aforesaid reply given by the appellant shows that he neither
controverted the allegations levelled against him nor explained
about his stance rather made an evasive denial by stating that
nothing objectionable is being printed in the magazine.
7.
The District Coordination Officer, Chiniot on the basis of
aforesaid facts of the case and after providing opportunity of
hearing to the appellant, passed a well-reasoned order dated
15.02.2012 and the reasons mentioned in the said order could not
be rebutted by the learned counsel for the appellant. For ready
reference, order dated 15.02.2012 is reproduced as under:
“OFFICE OF THE
DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER
CHINIOT
Subject:
CANCELLATION OF DECLARATION OF
MONTHLY MISBAH
ORDER
Briefly stating, Mutehida Ulema Board Punjab in
its meeting held on 27.06.2011 has recommended cancellation of
declaration of Monthly Magazine Misbah for publishing
objectionable material. This information was received through letter
No.SO (IS.III) 6-15/2010, dated 27.10.2011 of Home Department,
Government of the Punjab. It has also been informed that
propagation of Qadianiat is a crime Under Section 298-C of PPC.
The Monthly Misbah has been declared as propagating Qadianiat
and as such recommended to be banned by Mutahida Ulema Board
Punjab constituted by the Chief Minister Punjab. Therefore,
declaration of Monthly Misbah may be cancelled.
In pursuance of the subject matter, the record
pertaining to Monthly Misbah was obtained from District Jhang as
the same was not available in this office. Perusal of record reveals
that the declaration of Monthly Misbah in the name of Sheikh
Khurshid Ahmad S/o Sheikh Salamat Ali was authenticated by the
then District Magistrate on 22.09.1986. After going through the
relevant material received from the Home Department, Government
of the Punjab, a Notice U/S 19 of Press, Newspapers, News
Agencies and Books Registration Ordinance, 2002 was issued in the
name of Tahir Mehdi Imtiaz Ahmad Warraich, the Printer of
Monthly Misbah Chenab Nagar. It is pertinent to mention here that
on account of death of Sheikh Khurshid Ahmad in whose name the
declaration in question was authenticated, the said notice was served
upon Mr. Tahir Mehdi Imtiaz Ahmad Warraich who is the Printer as
well as applicant for change of Publisher of Monthly Misbah,
considering him the concerned party
Press Appeal No.225/2012
11
Mr. Tahir Mehdi Imtiaz Ahmad Warraich appeared
before the undersigned on 6.2.2012 and his statement was recorded
accordingly. He has contended that no objectionable material is
being published in Monthly Misbah. He has further prayed that the
declaration of Monthly Misbah may not be cancelled.
I have gone through the relevant literature received
from the Home Department and other material available on record.
Arguments of Mr. Tahir Mehdi Imtiaz Ahmad Warraich have also
been heard at length. It is observed as under:
1) According to Section 6(6) of Press, Newspapers, News
Agencies and Books Registration Ordinance, 2002, the
declaration submitted by the publisher under sub-section (5)
shall be accompanied by an undertaking by the editor to abide
by the Ethical Code of Practice contained in the schedule to the
Press Council of Pakistan Ordinance which inter alia lays down:
“The Press shall avoid originating, printing, publishing
and disseminating any material, which encourages or
incites discrimination or hatred on grounds of race,
religion, caste, sect, nationality, ethnicity, gender,
disability, illness, or age, of an individual or group”.
2) The Monthly Misbah contains material which is preaching as
well as propagation of Qadianiat within the meaning of Section
289-C of PPC.
3) Mr. Tahir Mahdi Imtiaz Ahmad Warraich has failed to prove
that Misbah does not contain objectionable material.
4) Mutehida Ulema Board Punjab constituted by the Chief Minister
Punjab has recommended to ban the Monthly Magazine Misbah.
In the light of above mentioned observations, I am
convinced that Monthly Magazine Misbah is being published in
contravention of provisions of Press, Newspapers, News Agencies
and Books Registration Ordinance, 2002. Therefore, I Dr. Irshad
Ahmed, District Coordination Officer, Chiniot hereby cancel the
declaration in respect of Monthly Magazine Misbah authenticated
by the then District Magistrate Jhang with immediate effect. The
Printer of Monthly Misbah is directed to stop circulation of the
Monthly Misbah forthwith under intimation to this office.
DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER
CHINIOT”
Furthermore, under Section 99-A of Criminal Procedure Code
(Cr.P.C.), 1898, the Government is competent to forfeit any
publication if it is satisfied that such publication contains
objectionable material as prescribed in law. For ready reference,
Section 99-A Cr.P.C. is reproduced as under:
“99-A Power to declare certain publications forfeited and
to issue search warrants for the same. (1) Where
Press Appeal No.225/2012
12
a) Any newspaper, or book as defined in the West
Pakistan Press and Publication Ordinance, 1963, or any
other law relating to press and publications for the time
being in force or
b) Any document.
(2) In sub-section (1) “document” includes also any painting,
drawing or photograph, or otherwise visible representation.”
8.
As regard the argument of learned counsel for the
appellant that the declaration of the magazine has been cancelled
on the recommendations of Muttehida Ulema Board which has no
authority in this regard as such the impugned order is not
sustainable in the eyes of law, suffice it to say in this regard that
on receipt of the material record/ information the District
Coordination Officer after application of judicious mind issued
show cause notice [dated 01.02.2012] to the appellant to appear
on 06.02.2012 and to explain his position on the allegation
regarding preaching of Qadianiat through the magazine. In
response to the said notice, the appellant appeared before the said
Officer on 06.02.2012 and filed reply [as reproduced in paragraph
No.5 of this judgment] and the appellant was also heard at full
length by the DCO before passing the impugned order as
envisaged in Article 10-A of the Constitution as well as mandated
by Section 19 of the Press, Newspapers, News Agencies and
Books Registration Ordinance 2002. Thus, the argument of
learned counsel for the appellant is devoid of any substance
which is accordingly hereby repelled.
9.
Further, as regard the stance of the appellant that the
declaration regarding cancellation of the magazine of the
appellant is result of discrimination, the same is illusive, suffice it
to say that while scanning contents of the transcripts/publications
of the Magazine Misbah, Muttehida Ulema Board has found
objectionable material and even the Home Department has also
recommended for cancellation of declaration of publications
having objectionable material across the board without targeting
Press Appeal No.225/2012
13
any specific group. It is apparent from the impugned notification
that as many as seven publications of different book / magazine
have been banned which dismantles the very foundation of the
above argument. The recommendations dated 27.06.2011 made
by the Muttehida Ulema Board as well as notification dated
26.10.2011, issued by the Home Department, reproduced in
paragraph No.5 of this judgment have not been questioned before
any competent forum whereas the said recommendations were in
the active knowledge of the appellant, thus the said
recommendations of the Home Department have attained finality.
10.
As the appellant through publishing the objectionable
material in magazine in question has committed blatant violation
of the aforementioned provisions of law as such the District
Coordination Officer, Chiniot has rightly cancelled the
declaration of the magazine-Misbah through the well-reasoned
order dated 15.02.2012 as such the same does not require any
indulgence from this Court in its appellate jurisdiction.
11.
Learned counsel for the appellant has not pointed out any
illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictional defect in the
impugned order calling for any interference through this appeal.
12.
In view of above, this appeal having no meri
Comments
Post a Comment