Saza (punishment) ke baad zamanat karwane ka tareeka
 |
| Bail after conviction |
Saza ya conviction buhat sare cases main hu jati ha or or saza ke baad High court ma appeal lagne ke baad court main apni baari aane tak appeal ka intaazar karna aik sabar azma or takleef deh marhla hota ha. Yeh marhla or bhi takleef deh ban jata ha jab mulzam begunah hu or us ke bari hone ke chances ziada hun
Dekha gia hai ke high court se ya supreme court se mulzman bari hu jate hain magar ju unho ne saza bhugat li hoti ha us ka azala phir mumkan nahi hota. So high court se saza ke baad zamanat karwane ke liye ju section deal karta hai wo section ha 426 Criminal procedure code wo section kuch iss tarah se hai.
426. Suspension of sentence pending appeals--Release of appellant on bail: (1)
Pending any appeal by a convicted person, the Appellate Court may, for reasons to be
recorded by It in writing, order, that the execution of the sentence or order appealed
against be suspended and, also, if he is in confinement, that he be released on bail or on
his own bond.
(1-A) [Omitted by Ordinance, LIV of 2001.]
(2) The power, conferred by this section on an Appellate Court may be exercised also by
the High Court in the case of any appeal by ,a convicted person to a Court subordinate
thereto
2-A) Subject to the provisions of Section 382-A when any person other, than a person
accused of a non-bailable offence is sentenced to imprisonment by a Court, and an
appeal lies from that sentence, the Court may, if the convicted person satisfies the Court
that he intends to present
an appeal order that be released J3n bail, for a period sufficient in the Opinion of the Court
to enable him to present the appeal and obtain the orders of the Appellate Court under
sub-section (1) and the sentence of imprisonment shall, so long as he is so released on
bail, be deemed to be suspended.
(2-B) Where a High Court is satisfied that a convicted person has been granted special
leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against any sentence which it has imposed or
maintained, it may, ,if it so thinks fit order that pending the appeal the sentence or order
appealed against be suspended and, also, if the said parson is in confinement, that he be
released on bail.
(3) When the appellant is ultimately sentenced to imprisonment, or imprisonment for life
the time during which he is so released shall be excluded in computing the term for
which he is so sentenced.
High court or supreme court ke faisla jaat.
- Mulzam ki saza multawi hoi thi iss case main kionke mulzam pichle 12 saal se jail main tha or mulzam per 302 B ka case tha iss wajah se mulzam ko final faisle tak zamanat per raha karne ka hukam de dia PLJ-2022-CRC-611(dB)
- Section 426 criminal procedure code ke tanazar main saza ki suspension ko malhooz e khatar rakhte hoe evidence ka gehrai se mainaa nahi kia ja sakta. PLD 2019-Isi-38
- Agar gaidi ka ilaj jail main na hu sakta hu tu us ko zamanat per raha kia ja sakta hai.PLJ 2019-ISB-158(DB)
- Mulzam ke ooper same ilzam tha jab ke sathi mulzmaan ko bari kar dia gia kionke muhlak injury mulzam se mansoob ki gai thi or iss baat ko mad e nazar na rakha gia tha ke iss injury se 3 mulzman ko mansoob kia gia tha. Mulzam ki saza suspend kar di gai. 2016-SCMR-1325
- It is now established beyond any doubt that benefit of doubt can be extended even preliminary stage i-e Bail suspension of sentence 2022-SCMR-1555
- اگر سزا یافتہ شخص عدالت سے ضمانت ملنے کے بعد مفرور ہو جائے تو اسے دوبارہ ضمانت نہیں مل سکتی
- 1985 SCMR 97
- PLD 1991SC 3
**Exploring Section 426 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) in Pakistan**
Section 426 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) holds significant importance in the legal landscape of Pakistan, empowering appellate courts with the authority to modify sentences and orders passed by subordinate courts. Let's delve into the key provisions and implications of Section 426 CrPC in the Pakistani context.
### **Scope and Applicability**
Section 426 CrPC in Pakistan pertains to the powers of appellate courts, both at the provincial High Courts and Sessions Courts, to alter or modify sentences and orders imposed by lower courts. It plays a crucial role in ensuring that justice is administered fairly and effectively.
### **Modification of Sentences and Orders**
One of the primary functions of Section 426 is to grant appellate courts the power to modify sentences. This includes the authority to reduce or enhance the sentence, depending on the circumstances of the case. Additionally, the section allows for the alteration of orders issued by lower courts.
### **Considerations for Modification**
In exercising the powers granted under Section 426 CrPC, the appellate courts in Pakistan must consider various factors. These may include the gravity of the offense, the conduct of the accused, any new evidence that may have come to light, and other relevant circumstances. The overarching goal is to ensure that the modification aligns with the principles of justice.
### **Procedure for Modification**
Appellate courts can initiate modification proceedings under Section 426 either suo moto or in response to an appeal filed by the concerned parties. The court has the authority to call for the record of the case, examine evidence, and hear the arguments of both sides before making any modifications.
### **Harmonization with Other Legal Provisions**
Section 426 CrPC in Pakistan is intricately linked with other sections of the CrPC. It complements provisions like Section 374, which defines the types of appeals, and Section 389, which deals with the suspension of sentence pending the appeal. Understanding the interplay between these sections is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the appellate process.
### **Precedents and Jurisprudence**
Over the years, the Pakistani judiciary has contributed to the interpretation and application of Section 426 through landmark judgments. These decisions have played a pivotal role in shaping the jurisprudence surrounding the modification of sentences and orders, ensuring a nuanced and context-specific approach.
### **Challenges and Considerations**
While Section 426 CrPC empowers the appellate courts, its application is not without challenges. Striking a balance between the interests of justice and the rights of the accused requires a careful examination of each case. The courts must navigate through legal complexities and uphold the principles of fairness and equity.
### **Conclusion**
Section 426 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Pakistan stands as a cornerstone in the realm of criminal justice, providing the necessary tools for appellate courts to rectify errors and ensure that justice is served. A thorough understanding of this section is essential for legal practitioners, scholars, and anyone engaged with the legal system in Pakistan, as it represents a critical element in the pursuit of a just and equitable society.
**پاکستان میں ضابطہ فوجداری (سی آر پی سی) کی دفعہ 426 کی تلاش**
کوڈ آف کرمنل پروسیجر (سی آر پی سی) کا سیکشن 426 پاکستان کے قانونی منظر نامے میں اہم اہمیت رکھتا ہے، جو کہ ماتحت عدالتوں کے ذریعے دیے گئے سزاؤں اور احکامات میں ترمیم کرنے کے اختیار کے ساتھ اپیلیٹ کورٹس کو بااختیار بناتا ہے۔ آئیے پاکستانی تناظر میں سیکشن 426 سی آر پی سی کی اہم دفعات اور مضمرات کا جائزہ لیتے ہیں۔
### **دائرہ کار اور قابل اطلاق**
پاکستان میں سیکشن 426 سی آر پی سی کا تعلق صوبائی ہائی کورٹس اور سیشن کورٹس دونوں میں، نچلی عدالتوں کی طرف سے عائد کردہ سزاؤں اور احکامات کو تبدیل یا تبدیل کرنے کے لیے اپیل کورٹس کے اختیارات سے ہے۔ یہ یقینی بنانے میں اہم کردار ادا کرتا ہے کہ انصاف کو منصفانہ اور مؤثر طریقے سے چلایا جائے۔
### **جملوں اور احکامات میں ترمیم**
سیکشن 426 کے بنیادی کاموں میں سے ایک اپیل عدالتوں کو سزاؤں میں ترمیم کرنے کا اختیار دینا ہے۔ اس میں کیس کے حالات کے لحاظ سے سزا کو کم کرنے یا بڑھانے کا اختیار شامل ہے۔ مزید برآں، یہ سیکشن نچلی عدالتوں کے جاری کردہ احکامات میں ردوبدل کی اجازت دیتا ہے۔
### **ترمیم کے لیے تحفظات**
سیکشن 426 CrPC کے تحت دیے گئے اختیارات کا استعمال کرتے ہوئے، پاکستان میں اپیل عدالتوں کو مختلف عوامل پر غور کرنا چاہیے۔ ان میں جرم کی سنگینی، ملزم کا طرز عمل، کوئی بھی نیا ثبوت جو سامنے آیا ہو، اور دیگر متعلقہ حالات شامل ہو سکتے ہیں۔ بنیادی مقصد یہ یقینی بنانا ہے کہ ترمیم انصاف کے اصولوں کے مطابق ہو۔
### **ترمیم کا طریقہ کار**
اپیل عدالتیں دفعہ 426 کے تحت یا تو از خود یا متعلقہ فریقوں کی طرف سے دائر کی گئی اپیل کے جواب میں ترمیم کی کارروائی شروع کر سکتی ہیں۔ عدالت کو اختیار ہے کہ وہ کیس کا ریکارڈ طلب کرے، شواہد کا جائزہ لے اور کوئی بھی ترمیم کرنے سے پہلے فریقین کے دلائل سنے۔
### **دیگر قانونی دفعات کے ساتھ ہم آہنگی**
پاکستان میں سیکشن 426 سی آر پی سی سی آر پی سی کے دیگر سیکشنز سے پیچیدہ طور پر منسلک ہے۔ یہ سیکشن 374 جیسی دفعات کی تکمیل کرتا ہے، جو اپیل کی اقسام کی وضاحت کرتا ہے، اور سیکشن 389، جو اپیل کے زیر التواء سزا کی معطلی سے متعلق ہے۔ اپیل کے عمل کی جامع تفہیم کے لیے ان حصوں کے درمیان تعامل کو سمجھنا بہت ضروری ہے۔
### **نظیریں اور فقہ**
سالوں کے دوران، پاکستانی عدلیہ نے تاریخی فیصلوں کے ذریعے دفعہ 426 کی تشریح اور اطلاق میں تعاون کیا ہے۔ ان فیصلوں نے ایک اہم کردار ادا کیا ہے جس میں جملے اور احکامات کی ترمیم کے ارد گرد فقہ کی تشکیل میں اہم کردار ادا کیا گیا ہے، ایک باریک اور سیاق و سباق کے لحاظ سے مخصوص نقطہ نظر کو یقینی بنایا گیا ہے۔
### **چیلنجز اور غور و فکر**
جبکہ سیکشن 426 سی آر پی سی اپیل عدالتوں کو بااختیار بناتا ہے، اس کا اطلاق چیلنجوں کے بغیر نہیں ہے۔ انصاف کے مفادات اور ملزم کے حقوق کے درمیان توازن قائم کرنے کے لیے ہر کیس کا بغور جائزہ لینے کی ضرورت ہے۔ عدالتوں کو قانونی پیچیدگیوں سے گزرنا چاہیے اور انصاف اور مساوات کے اصولوں کو برقرار رکھنا چاہیے۔
### **نتیجہ**
پاکستان میں ضابطہ فوجداری کا سیکشن 426 فوجداری انصاف کے دائرے میں ایک سنگ بنیاد کے طور پر کھڑا ہے، جو اپیل عدالتوں کو غلطیوں کی اصلاح اور انصاف کی فراہمی کو یقینی بنانے کے لیے ضروری آلات فراہم کرتا ہے۔ اس سیکشن کی مکمل تفہیم قانونی ماہرین، اسکالرز اور پاکستان میں قانونی نظام سے منسلک ہر فرد کے لیے ضروری ہے، کیونکہ یہ ایک منصفانہ اور منصفانہ معاشرے کے حصول میں ایک اہم عنصر کی نمائندگی کرتا ہے۔
Form No.HCJD/C-121
ORDER SHEET
LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE.
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Crl. Appeal No.241575-J/2018
Sajid alias Saji
Vs
The State, etc.
S.No. of
Order/
Proceeding
Date of
order/
Proceeding
Order with signature of Judge and that of parties or
counsel where necessary
Crl. Misc. No.01/2022.
(05)
10.04.2023
Ch. Imtiaz Hussain Bhatti, Advocate for the applicant.
Hafiz Abdul Rehman Ansari, Advocate for the
complainant.
Mr. Ali Hassan, Additional Prosecutor General.
The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gujranwala, vide
his judgment dated 28.09.2018, awarded imprisonment for life to the
petitioner- Sajid alias Saji, under Section 302 read with Section 34,
P.P.C. in a private complaint, which is under challenge through the
accompanying appeal, who, through the instant petition, has sought
suspension of his sentence and admitting him to bail till disposal of
the main appeal, on statutory ground of delay in decision of appeal
pending for a period of more than four and half years, as submitted by
the learned counsel for the petitioner, which is not negated by the
learned counsel representing the complainant.
2.
Admitted position is that appellant’s appeal against
conviction is pending in the Court for the last more than four years,
without any fault on his part, whereas proviso (c) of Section 426(1A),
Cr.P.C. stipulates release of those convicts whose appeals could not
be heard according to the parameter given in it declaring it statutory
right of the convict to claim his bail if he had already served such
period, i.e.,
“426(1A)
(c)
to imprisonment for life or imprisonment
exceeding seven years and whose appeal has not been
decided within a period of two years of his conviction:”
In support, reliance is placed on ‘Shahbaz v. The State’ (1992 SCMR
1903), wherein it has been held,
“A perusal of the above subsection (1-A) with its clause
(c) indicates that an, appellate Court is required to
release convicted person on bail if he has been awarded
imprisonment for life or imprisonment exceeding seven
years and his appeal has not been decided within a
period of two years of his conviction unless, the appellate
Court for the reasons to be recorded directs otherwise.”
Same view had been taken in the case law cited in ‘Muhammad
Yaqoob and others v. The state’ (1991 SCMR 1459). ‘Ghulam
Murtaza v. State, etc.’ (PLJ 2022 SC (Cr.C.) 78, ‘Safeer Ullah @
Sagheer @ Jugnu v. State and another’ (PLJ 2018 SC 450),
Makhdoom Javed Hashmi v. The State’ (2008 SCMR 165), Rana
Muhammad Ashiq and 6 others v. The State’ (1996 SCMR 1559),
‘Liaqat and another v. The State’ (1995 SCMR 1819) and ‘Altaf
Hussain Shah v. The State’ (1994 SCMR 480) are also referred.
3.
In view of the above it is held that during pendency of his
appeal, the applicant has earned a statutory right to be released on bail
in terms of proviso (c) of Section 426(1A), Cr.P.C. In this view of the
matter, I am inclined to accept this application, in consequence
whereof, the operation of the impugned judgment is suspended, and
the applicant is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing
bail bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lac only) with one
surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar
(Judicial) of this Court.
(MUHAMMAD AMEER BHATTI)
CHIEF JUSTICE
Approved for reporting.
Gull*
CHIEF JUSTICE
Comments
Post a Comment