Posts

Featured Post

Court marriage karne ka tareeka | court marriage process in Pakistan.

-
Image
  What is the Court marriage meaning Court marriage typically refers to a legal union between two individuals that takes place in a court of law, as opposed to a religious ceremony or a traditional cultural celebration. In Pakistan, court marriages are a straightforward and secular way for couples to formalize their marital status. The ceremony is conducted by a legal authority, often a judge or a magistrate, and it involves the couple signing the marriage documents in the presence of witnesses. This type of marriage is recognized by the state and carries legal validity.              Court marriage procedure  In Pakistan in Urdu . Dosto humare logon main buhat se log court marriage ke bare main na jante hoe buhat si mushkalat ka shikar ho jatain  hain . main ne aise buht se cases handle kiye hain jin main larki ki razamandi ke sath couple ghar se bhagtey hain . magar qanoon se nawaqfiat hone ki wajah se  wo court marriage nahin kr patey jiss ka nateeja yeh niklta hai keh larki
43 comments
Read more

failure to prove the pre-emption claim, citing deficiencies in pleadings, lack of evidence regarding notice issuance and service, and failure to comply with statutory requirements.

-
Image
Pre-emption claim  Title: Landmark Judgement: Lahore High Court Decision in C.R. No.1527-D of 2018 In a recent ruling by the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, a significant decision was made in Civil Revision No.1527-D of 2018 between Zafar Iqbal and Muhammad Amjad Shami. The judgement, delivered on April 18, 2024, by Justice Faisal Zaman Khan, addressed critical issues surrounding a suit for possession through pre-emption. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Muhammad Masood Bilal, Advocate, contested the judgments and decrees dated April 4, 2018, and September 8, 2018, passed by the civil judge and additional district judge, respectively, in Chichawatni. The suit for possession through pre-emption filed by the petitioner was dismissed by both courts, leading to the civil revision. The case revolved around divergent pleadings, with the petitioner claiming a superior right of pre-emption over the respondent. However, crucial discrepancies surfaced during the proceedings, casting doubt on
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lahore High Court ruled that Family Courts lack jurisdiction to adjudicate civil disputes outside the scope of family matters, emphasizing the importance of upholding legal authority and directing the transfer of civil cases to competent Civil Judges.

-
Image
Title: Understanding the Implications of Lahore High Court's Judgment on Jurisdiction of Family Courts In a recent ruling, the Lahore High Court, Judicial Department, addressed the crucial issue of jurisdiction concerning Family Courts in the Pakistani legal system. The judgment, handed down in Civil Revision No.54194 of 2023, sheds light on the interpretation of statutes governing the jurisdiction of Family Courts and the extent of their authority in adjudicating civil disputes. The case stemmed from a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Family Court to hear civil matters outside the scope of family disputes. The petitioners challenged an order issued by the District Judge, Pakpattan, which denied their application to withdraw civil cases from the Senior Civil Judge (Family Division) and transfer them to the Court of Civil Judge or Senior Civil Judge (Civil Division). The petitioners argued that the Family Courts Act, 1964, limited the jurisdiction of Family Courts to family disp
Post a Comment
Read more

legal terrain of cost of funds |

-
Image
Cost of funds Title: Understanding the Legal Implications of Cost of Funds: A Case Analysis In the complex world of legal proceedings, cases often involve the careful interpretation of statutes, precedents and legal principles. One such case that highlights the complexities of financial disputes and legal provisions is United Bank Limited v. Muhammad Amjad Hayat Khan. This case highlights the concept of "cost of funds" and its legal implications within the framework of financial institutions and financial recovery. The dispute arose when the defendant Muhammad Amjad Hayat Khan filed a suit against United Bank Limited (the appellant) for recovery of a sum of Rs.10,000. 4,73,945.21. Initially, the bank's case for recovery against Khan was dismissed, but Khan later took legal action to claim the money, arguing that he was entitled to profits on the funds held by the bank. The main point of contention in this case revolves around the concept of "cost of funds". Cost
Post a Comment
Read more

Validity of impugned notices | Judicial Review of Tax Assessment: A Case Study Analysis |

-
Image
High Court set aside the impugned notices and directed the Punjab revenue. authority to conduct a proper inquiry High Court set aside the impugned notices and directed the Punjab revenue. authority to conduct a proper inquiry Title: Judicial Review of Tax Assessment: A Case Study Analysis The recent judgment delivered by Justice Jawad Hassan in W.P. No. 4290 of 2023 sheds light on the legal intricacies surrounding the issuance of show cause notices under the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012 ("the Act"). The case, along with connected petitions, presents a significant examination of the vires of show cause notices issued by the Punjab Revenue Authority, Government of Punjab, under Section 24(2) of the Act. The petitioners, taxpayers subject to the impugned notices, contested their validity on several grounds. They argued that the estimates provided by the authority were based on assumptions contrary to the data already submitted in their tax returns under Section 35 of t
Post a Comment
Read more